1993
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure Determination and Refinement of Human Alpha Class Glutathione Transferase A1-1, and a Comparison with the Mu and Pi Class Enzymes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
524
1
8

Year Published

1993
1993
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(543 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
524
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…While this manuscript was in press, the X-ray crystal structure of human Al-1 GST, with S-phenyl GSH bound, was published (Sinning et al, 1993). This structure indicates that Trp 21 lies in a hydrophobic region between domains of the individual subunits.…”
Section: Note Added In Proofmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While this manuscript was in press, the X-ray crystal structure of human Al-1 GST, with S-phenyl GSH bound, was published (Sinning et al, 1993). This structure indicates that Trp 21 lies in a hydrophobic region between domains of the individual subunits.…”
Section: Note Added In Proofmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This core contains the loops and adjacent secondary structural elements corre- sponding to motifs 1 and 11, plus the 10 other a-helices and /3-strands, which constitute the GST fold, and which are conserved among GSTM. GSTP, and GSTA (Rushmore C Pickett, 1993; Sinning et al, 1993;Dirr et al, 1994). The result of this threading experiment is thus a set of models based on the GST core and the lowest-energy mapping of the EFl y and GSTT sequences onto this structure (Bryant & Lawrence, 1993).…”
Section: Model Building and Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subunit is further divided into the N-terminal domain that consists of a 5-stranded 0-sheet and the a-helical C-terminal domain. The GSH-binding site is formed by residues in the N-terminal domain, whereas both the N-terminal and the C-terminal domain contribute to the binding site for the electrophilic GSH acceptor (Ji et al, 1992(Ji et al, , 1994Liu et al, 1992;Reinemer et al, 1992;Rushmore & Pickett, 1993;Sinning et al, 1993;Dirr et al, 1994). The GST-related domain of EFly is predicted to have a similar organization (Fig.…”
Section: Model Building and Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of crystal structures of pi, mu, and alpha class glutathione transferases (26 -28) have provided insights into the major interactions between subunits in the homodimers. Their subunit interfaces involve three types of interactions: polar contacts and hydrogen bonds between electrophilic amino acids, stacking of two symmetrically equivalent arginines (one from each subunit) (7,28) and hydrophobic interactions including a lock and key motif. In the lock and key motif an aromatic residue (key residue) from domain I in one subunit is wedged into a hydrophobic pocket formed by helices ␣4 and ␣5 in domain II of the other subunit (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%