2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2021.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-dependent adsorption and desorption of hydrogen on FCC and HCP cobalt surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a difference in adsorption capability between Co hcp and fcc is also observed in hydrogen adsorption. H 2 desorption peak on Co fcc (100) surface is observed at 260 K. On the other hand, H 2 desorption peak on Co hcp (0001) surface appears at 350 K . This may be attributed to strongly spin-polarized Co hcp; the polarized d-bond of Co 3d orbitals crosses the Fermi level .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Such a difference in adsorption capability between Co hcp and fcc is also observed in hydrogen adsorption. H 2 desorption peak on Co fcc (100) surface is observed at 260 K. On the other hand, H 2 desorption peak on Co hcp (0001) surface appears at 350 K . This may be attributed to strongly spin-polarized Co hcp; the polarized d-bond of Co 3d orbitals crosses the Fermi level .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…231 Step and kink sites might increase H* coverage, but this also results in desorption at lower temperatures by providing a low-energy path for both adsorption and desorption. 232 Comparison of the adsorption strengths on the most common cobalt surface facets suggests hydrogen adsorption is favored on the 3-fold hollow sites of close-packed terraces. Under FT conditions, other species will be present, affecting this hydrogen coverage and vice versa.…”
Section: Surface Science and Experimental Mechanistic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation of the TPD spectra of the closepacked Co(0001) and more open Co(1120) and Co(1012) surfaces showed that low-coordinated sites facilitate H 2 dissociation, suggesting the importance of step and kink sites in this reaction 231. Step and kink sites might increase H* coverage, but this also results in desorption at lower temperatures by providing a low-energy path for both adsorption and desorption 232. Comparison of the adsorption strengths on the most common cobalt surface facets suggests hydrogen adsorption is favored on the 3-fold hollow sites of close-packed terraces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the cobalt particle size decreased below 20 nm, the ratio exceeded 1.5, and the strong hydrogen binding sites dominated the catalyst surface. This is due to the multiplication of undercoordinated structures of cobalt, such as close-packed terraces, steps, and kinks at the cost of open surfaces [147], which bind H 2 hydrogen stronger than flat surfaces [148,149]. This trade-off leads to the hydrogen poisoning of the catalysts, limiting their activity.…”
Section: Cobalt-based Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%