2012
DOI: 10.3917/g2000.293.0083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure de propriété et qualité de l'audit externe : cas des entreprises belges cotées

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consequent is the desire to hire a better audit quality to control their behaviour. This result corroborates the predictions of agency theory and Gana and Lajmi (2012) in the Belgian context despite their differences. This result is also consistent with Piot (2001), Francis & Wilson (1988).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The consequent is the desire to hire a better audit quality to control their behaviour. This result corroborates the predictions of agency theory and Gana and Lajmi (2012) in the Belgian context despite their differences. This result is also consistent with Piot (2001), Francis & Wilson (1988).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The Cameroon context is recognised by offering a weak legal system that protects the interests of minority shareholders (Fossung & Magang, 2019). Our result is in the range of those obtained by Darmadi (2016), Gana and Lajmi (2012), Mustafa et al (2018) and Ameneh (2021). Also, there is a negative influence of SH/CRE on demand for external audit quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, [60] addressed auditor independence, and [61] defined auditor tenure. In this study, we used the [62] method, which is based on eight attributes to measure the quality of auditing. The eight attributes of audit quality as a measure of audit standards are: auditor size, co-statutory, audit opinion, audit lag, audit specialization, auditor size and co-statutory, audit tenure, and audit experience.…”
Section: Audit Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Une partie importante de la littérature suggère une association entre l'impact de certains mécanismes de gouvernance comme le conseil d'administration, la structure de propriété ou l'audit externe sur la performance de l'entreprise. D'autres se sont intéressées à l'influence des mécanismes de gouvernance tels que le conseil d'administration, ou la structure de propriété, sur la qualité de l'audit externe (Lajmi et Gana, 2011 ;Wafa, 2013). Récemment, les études se sont penchées sur le rôle de la qualité de la gouvernance sur la propension à produire des états financiers de qualité (Erickson et al, 2005 ;Farber, 2005 ;Cormier et Lapointe, 2006, Smaili, 2006Djoutsa et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified