1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4596(80)90002-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure cristalline du composé RbEu3F10

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with that of EuF 3 , the nitrogen content of NH 4 Eu 3 F 10 was higher, and the peaks of Eu 3d 5/2 spectrum slightly negatively shifted, which can be ascribed to the variation of electron cloud density on Eu 3+ due to the difference between the bonds of Eu-F in EuF 3 and NH 4 Eu 3 F 10 . [22][23][24][25] The results resemble those of EuF 3 :Tb 3+ and EuF 3 :Tb 3+ /NH 4 + hollow sub-microstructures we previously reported. 26 The ratio of N, Eu and F detected by XPS is 3.7 : 11.0 : 31.4, which is approximate to the stoichiometric ratio 1 : 3 : 10 of NH 4 Eu 3 F 10 , and further confirms the preparation of NH 4 Eu 3 F 10 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Compared with that of EuF 3 , the nitrogen content of NH 4 Eu 3 F 10 was higher, and the peaks of Eu 3d 5/2 spectrum slightly negatively shifted, which can be ascribed to the variation of electron cloud density on Eu 3+ due to the difference between the bonds of Eu-F in EuF 3 and NH 4 Eu 3 F 10 . [22][23][24][25] The results resemble those of EuF 3 :Tb 3+ and EuF 3 :Tb 3+ /NH 4 + hollow sub-microstructures we previously reported. 26 The ratio of N, Eu and F detected by XPS is 3.7 : 11.0 : 31.4, which is approximate to the stoichiometric ratio 1 : 3 : 10 of NH 4 Eu 3 F 10 , and further confirms the preparation of NH 4 Eu 3 F 10 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For example, RbSm 3 F 10 (based on the larger Sm 3+ ion) crystallizes in the cubic phase, while RbGd 3 F 10 (and smaller rare earth ions paired with Rb) crystallizes in the hexagonal phase. For RbSm 3 F 10 , this is consistent with what is reported for polycrystalline material prepared by solid-state techniques (Chamberlain & Corruccini, 2006), and correlates with the single-crystal structure reported for RbEu 3 F 10 also obtained by solid-state techniques (Arbus et al, 1980). However, in the case of RbGd 3 F 10 , differences in the synthetic method appear to contribute to the synthesis of hexagonal single crystals in the present hydrothermal study compared with cubic powders prepared by solid-state methods (Chamberlain & Corruccini, 2003).…”
Section: The Are 3 F 10 Systemsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Compared to the Eu 0.95 Tb 0.05 F 3 sample (curve a), the peaks of the Eu 3d 5/2 spectrum for the samples with a high Tb 3+ content show a small negative shift, which suggests the difference of the complexation state and the crystal field of the fluoride matrix. Since the bonds of Ln-F in LnF 3 are different with those of NH 4 Ln 3 F 10 , [55][56][57][58][59] the small negative shift of Eu 3d 5/2 can be indexed to the more electron cloud drain from the Eu 3+ to F 2 due to the shorter bonds of Eu-F. Consistent with this, the Tb 3d 5/2 spectrum of the samples with a high Eu content reveals a negative shift toward lower binding energy compared to those of the NH 4 Eu 1.5 Tb 1.5 F 10 sample (curve d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%