Structure Correlation 1994
DOI: 10.1002/9783527616091.ch13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure Correlation and Ligand/Receptor Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It frequently occurs (as adenosine or guanosine monophosphate) as part of cofactors (e.g., NAD, NADP, FAD, ADP, GDP, ATP) bound to protein receptors. Its conformational properties have been studied in detail [2] by comparing structural data from small-molecule crystal structures with those from ligand-enzyme structures determined by protein crystallography.…”
Section: The Program In Operation: a Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It frequently occurs (as adenosine or guanosine monophosphate) as part of cofactors (e.g., NAD, NADP, FAD, ADP, GDP, ATP) bound to protein receptors. Its conformational properties have been studied in detail [2] by comparing structural data from small-molecule crystal structures with those from ligand-enzyme structures determined by protein crystallography.…”
Section: The Program In Operation: a Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain some evidence for the question put forward on an experimental basis, the geometries of ligands observed in crystal structures of ligand-protein complexes were compared to those obtained from small-molecule crystal structure analyses and computational methods [2]. Crystallographic data are of particular relevance for the present problem, since conformations of molecules adopted in a crystal correspond to geometries exhibited in an anisotropic molecular environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Numerous approaches have been taken to this problem ranging from the highly empirical to more rigorous methods, such as free-energy perturbation (FEP) techniques. A detailed discussion is out of the scope of this paper (see also [71]), but it is worth pointing out that a major component in many of the empirical schemes is a measure of the geometric complementarity of the ligand and receptor. This can be expressed as the buried surface area of the ligand [4], [13], [14], or the contact area of the two molecules [83].…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%