2017
DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20170000053013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure, Content, and Meaning of Organizational Networks: Extending Network Thinking, Introduction

Abstract: General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There, the interest in semantic networks in the 1990s brought together the perspectives and techniques of communication science, cognitive science and sociolinguistics in a movement known as formal analysis of culture. Led by John Mohr (1994Mohr ( , 1998Mohr ( , 2000 (see also Kirchner and Mohr, 2010;Ferguson, Groenewegen, Moser, Borgatti and Mohr, 2017;Edelmann and Mohr, 2018), this movement is largely responsible for the growing popularity of semantic network analysis in sociology nowadays Kozlowski, Taddy and Evans, 2019). Formal analysts approach culture as "relations rather individual elements and the patterns arising in these" (Edelmann and Mohr, 2018: 3) and aim at theorizing cultural mechanisms and applying formal methods to cultural data in search of the corresponding cultural patterns.…”
Section: The Roots Of Socio-semantic Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There, the interest in semantic networks in the 1990s brought together the perspectives and techniques of communication science, cognitive science and sociolinguistics in a movement known as formal analysis of culture. Led by John Mohr (1994Mohr ( , 1998Mohr ( , 2000 (see also Kirchner and Mohr, 2010;Ferguson, Groenewegen, Moser, Borgatti and Mohr, 2017;Edelmann and Mohr, 2018), this movement is largely responsible for the growing popularity of semantic network analysis in sociology nowadays Kozlowski, Taddy and Evans, 2019). Formal analysts approach culture as "relations rather individual elements and the patterns arising in these" (Edelmann and Mohr, 2018: 3) and aim at theorizing cultural mechanisms and applying formal methods to cultural data in search of the corresponding cultural patterns.…”
Section: The Roots Of Socio-semantic Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We specifically complement these earlier studies by examining the connectivity of an idea in a content network. Scholars increasingly pay attention to how meaning is conveyed in networks (Ferguson et al, 2017) and in particular to the language and vocabulary that is used to express ideas (Moser et al, 2017;Van Atteveldt, Moser, and Welbers, 2017). Whether an idea is novel or not is believed to be reflected in the description of that idea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the broader organizational literature, there has been a growing effort in recent years to understand the role of culture and meaning in organizational network processes (Ferguson et al, 2017). Although social network analysis recognizes the importance of the structural connections between actors for explaining organizational phenomena, it has historically ignored the cultural content of those ties.…”
Section: Educational Applications and Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%