1984
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.23.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure Change of Microcrystalline Silicon Films in Deposition Process

Abstract: Structure change with thickness of films of microcrystalline silicon prepared by reactive sputtering and glow discharge techniques has been investigated with transmission electron microscopes and a Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer. An amorphous state changes into a microcrystalline one with increase of the thickness from 10 to 100 nm. Sufficiently thick films (>0.4∼0.5 µm) deposited by the reactive sputtering show a columnar structure with an orientation of microcrystals {110} parallel to the su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ecsdl.org/site/terms_use address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see 134.129.120 3. Downloaded on 2015-06-27 to IP…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ecsdl.org/site/terms_use address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see 134.129.120 3. Downloaded on 2015-06-27 to IP…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be interpreted as the interruption of the thermal excitation of electrons to the conduction band at low temperatures. In doped µc-Si:H, the EPR signal intensity of the conduction electrons exhibited a maximum at approximately 20 K. The temperature dependence suggests that the doped samples have shallower donor levels in µc-Si:H. This is supported by the fact that the EPR signals of the conduction electron are stronger in the N-doped samples (2)(3)(4) than in the undoped sample (1). We measured the conductivity of undoped and nitrogendoped µc-Si:H in the range of temperatures from room temperature to 77 K (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1,2) The µc-Si:H film has different electrical properties from hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H), although both are prepared by a plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) method. [3][4][5] One of the most important properties with respect to application in actual devices is the considerable effect of impurity doping on the conductivity of µc-Si:H compared with a-Si:H. The phosphorous-doped and boron-doped µc-Si:H films exhibit the conductivity of 10 −1 -10 0 −1 cm −1 , which is higher than those of a-Si:H containing the same impurities. 6,7) In addition, conduction electrons have been observed by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements in phosphorous-doped µc-Si:H, although they have not been observed in doped a-Si:H. 8) In the previous study, the nitrogen doping effect on the conductivity of µc-Si:H at room temperature was briefly reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This di erence between a-Si : H and a-Si is due to the existence of hydrogen in a-Si : H ® lms, that is hydrogen in these ® lms plays an important role in passivatin g silicon danglin g bonds (DBs) and thus in producing materials with suitable photoelectronic properties. Moreover, various types of structure, that is amorphous , microcrystalline and polycrystallin e forms, are attained in a conventional glow-dischar ge system using H 2 -diluted SiH 4 gas (Usui and Kikuchi 1979, Spear et al 1981, Mishima et al 1982, Kumeda et al 1982, Matsuda 1983, Imura et al 1984, Tsai 1989. A n interesting question is how the addition of H 2 to SiH 4 a ects the structure and the bonding scheme of the incorporated hydrogen in a-Si : H. We have already reported our preliminary results concerning the hydrogen dilution e ect (Y amaguch i and Morigaki 1991).…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%