2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-021-00884-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-based investigation of fluorogenic Pepper aptamer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 B,C). Inside the junction regions, we observed negligible difference in SHAPE reactivity between the three ligands tested, confirming that the mode of binding is conserved as indicated by the previously determined crystal structures 34 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3 B,C). Inside the junction regions, we observed negligible difference in SHAPE reactivity between the three ligands tested, confirming that the mode of binding is conserved as indicated by the previously determined crystal structures 34 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…3 B,C). From the crystal structure 34 and our EM data we would expect this to be one of the more dynamic residues as it has no hydrogen bonding partner and is only supported by base stacking from one adjacent nucleotide. The three next nucleotides (position 5-7) show significant flexibility in the apo-structure that is attenuated in the ligand bound state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 A-B ). Secondly, to select the light-up RNA aptamers, we compare the fluorescence of Peppers, which have superior properties, with that of Broccoli, which is one of the widely used light-up RNA aptamers [28] , [34] , [35] . Pepper exhibits a higher signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) (205.2-fold, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%