2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11030-021-10297-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-based identification of galectin-1 selective modulators in dietary food polyphenols: a pharmacoinformatics approach

Abstract: In this study, a set of dietary polyphenols was comprehensively studied for the selective identification of the potential inhibitors/modulators for galectin-1. Galectin-1 is a potent prognostic indicator of tumor progression and a highly regarded therapeutic target for various pathological conditions. This indicator is composed of a highly conserved carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) that accounts for the binding affinity of β-galactosides. Although some small molecules have been identified as galectin-1 in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(108 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of their universality, AutoDock Vina and NNScore 1.0 are better solutions in the absence of known ligands . To improve the description of the complexes, the energy-describing scoring function was adopted by the updated AutoDock Vina. , Driven by the developments of deep learning, end-to-end frameworks for predicting protein–ligand binding affinities, like K DEEP , have become a trend in the upgrading of SFs and successfully applied in the identification of potent food constituents against SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease, verifying the better binding affinity of proposed dietary food compounds with SARS-CoV-2 PLpro protein compared to the standard compound VBY; similarly, K DEEP has been used for the binding affinity prediction of dietary polyphenols for the selective identification of the potential selective inhibitors/modulators for galectin-1 . Like other ML models, accurate ML scoring functions require high-quality data sets.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their universality, AutoDock Vina and NNScore 1.0 are better solutions in the absence of known ligands . To improve the description of the complexes, the energy-describing scoring function was adopted by the updated AutoDock Vina. , Driven by the developments of deep learning, end-to-end frameworks for predicting protein–ligand binding affinities, like K DEEP , have become a trend in the upgrading of SFs and successfully applied in the identification of potent food constituents against SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease, verifying the better binding affinity of proposed dietary food compounds with SARS-CoV-2 PLpro protein compared to the standard compound VBY; similarly, K DEEP has been used for the binding affinity prediction of dietary polyphenols for the selective identification of the potential selective inhibitors/modulators for galectin-1 . Like other ML models, accurate ML scoring functions require high-quality data sets.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular docking has already been recognized as a prototype of structure-based virtual screening [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. In this approach, potential molecules are identified from large chemical databases and binding interaction affinity is predicted toward the protein targets of interest.…”
Section: Molecular Docking Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%