Cholera 2012
DOI: 10.5772/37635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure Based Design of Cholera Toxin Antagonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 binds with its galactose moiety in the galactose-binding pocket, interacting with Glu51, Gln61, Asn90 and Lys91(Figures 2A,Band 3B). The aryl moiety seems to be disordered in the crystal structure and is not clearly bound in the hydrophobic patch, differing from previous predictions(Podlipnik & Reina, 2012). No clear electron density is visible for the ligand after the peptide bond (Figure 2B).…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 binds with its galactose moiety in the galactose-binding pocket, interacting with Glu51, Gln61, Asn90 and Lys91(Figures 2A,Band 3B). The aryl moiety seems to be disordered in the crystal structure and is not clearly bound in the hydrophobic patch, differing from previous predictions(Podlipnik & Reina, 2012). No clear electron density is visible for the ligand after the peptide bond (Figure 2B).…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The differences to GM1-osbinding can be seen in the linker region of 2, where the hydrogen bond of the core Gal to the side chain of His13 is no longer achievable, but rather exchanged with a water-mediated connection between the carboxyl of the inhibitor's peptide bond to Asn14(Figure 3A,C). The ligand binding mode was predicted by earlier modeling experiments(Cheshev et al, 2010;Podlipnik & Reina, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%