2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-aware-based crack defect detection for multicrystalline solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method performs well in micro-crack defect detection task. Chen et al [26] applied 2D Hessian-based enhancement filter to obtain the linear-structure and blob-structure. Then, a novel structure similarity measure (SSM) function is designed by using the identification functions of two structures, which can highlight crack defect (line-structure), and suppress crystal grains (blobstructure) simultaneously.…”
Section: Related Work a Defect Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method performs well in micro-crack defect detection task. Chen et al [26] applied 2D Hessian-based enhancement filter to obtain the linear-structure and blob-structure. Then, a novel structure similarity measure (SSM) function is designed by using the identification functions of two structures, which can highlight crack defect (line-structure), and suppress crystal grains (blobstructure) simultaneously.…”
Section: Related Work a Defect Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [59] The authors presented a structure-aware crack defect detection scheme. It is based on two mathematical models, where the first one models a cracked surface, and the second one models a structured surface of a solar panel.…”
Section: Accuracy Is Not Specifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gaussian window is set as 45 according to the experiment. Figure 7c is the response map of the DoG calculated by Equation (8). In the collected image of an aluminum ingot surface, the gray value of the defect area is lower than the texture background in varying degrees, so this paper uses ( , ,7.1) ( , ) ( , ) G x y f x y f x y * − to reduce the influence of the background.…”
Section: Similar Areas Mergementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the statistical and structural textures appear as homogeneous ( Figure 1 a,b and Figure 2 a,b) or inhomogeneous ( Figure 1 c,d and Figure 2 c,d). It should be noted that Figure 1 d and Figure 2 b are respectively quoted from Reference [ 7 ] and Reference [ 8 ]. As can been seen, the milling surface we deal with features structured homogeneous or inhomogeneous textures ( Figure 2 a,c,d).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%