The public, private and voluntary health sectors together contribute towards the provision of health care in India. All these play significant roles in influencing the health status of the Indian population. But their contribution is not without shortcomings. Indeed, it is largely their inadequacies that account for the limited improvements in the health status of the Indian people. Unfortunately, the chances that the recognition of these pitfalls and their implications will be translated into action and change are very few, given the present influence of the structural adjustment programme on the social sector. On the contrary, the situation is expected to worsen. This paper provides a perspective on India's health care system in the post-independence period In describing India's public, private and voluntary health sectors, it highlights some of the reasons behind the marginal improvements in health status in the country. The health care system embraces a multitude of services provided to people by agents of health services or health professionals from the public, private and/or voluntary sectors for the purpose of promoting, maintaining, restoring and monitoring health. Health services have to be organised such that they are comprehensive, acceptable, accessible, available and affordable, and that they cater to the needs of the entire population, and cover the full range of preventive, curative and rehabilitation requirements. Despite widespread agreement that health services should reach the entire population and that they should be optimally utilised, in reality the scope of the health care system varies widely from country to country, and is influenced by various country-specific issues, ideologies, needs and resources. As a consequence, it is possible that health care services may fail to fulfil their mandate, with adverse effects on the health status of the population. At the same time, given the central role that health plays in the life of human beings and the