2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2016.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and tectonic setting of the SE Sardinia mafic dyke swarm. Insights for the stress state during magma emplacement in the upper crust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the observed peperite‐like dikes (Figure 3j) may be interpreted as preserved fluid‐filled cavity tips of propagating apophysis (Poppe et al., 2020 and references therein) where localized magma‐water interactions occurred (Westerman et al., 2017). Blunt geometries of some tips, irregular contacts, the larger thickness of the dike toward the tips, as well as plastic deformation of the low‐rigidity material indicate a shear‐dominated deformation (Mode II), as similarly observed in the literature (Dering et al., 2019; Martinez‐Poza & Druguet, 2016). This is the case where the host rock consists of cataclastic limestones, like in the uppermost part of the outcrop (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, the observed peperite‐like dikes (Figure 3j) may be interpreted as preserved fluid‐filled cavity tips of propagating apophysis (Poppe et al., 2020 and references therein) where localized magma‐water interactions occurred (Westerman et al., 2017). Blunt geometries of some tips, irregular contacts, the larger thickness of the dike toward the tips, as well as plastic deformation of the low‐rigidity material indicate a shear‐dominated deformation (Mode II), as similarly observed in the literature (Dering et al., 2019; Martinez‐Poza & Druguet, 2016). This is the case where the host rock consists of cataclastic limestones, like in the uppermost part of the outcrop (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The co‐occurrence of mechanical features predicted by both end‐member modes is called “mixed‐mode” fracturing (Rubin, 1995) and was found both in natural outcrops (e.g., Dering, Micklethwaite, Cruden, et al, 2019; Martinez‐Poza & Druguet, 2016) and laboratory experiments of fluid intrusion in natural rock samples (e.g., Zheng et al, 2019). Mechanical indicators of LEFM, such as tapered intrusion fronts and cavities, were found in some cases in association with dike opening profiles that depart from the parabolic shape expected in elastic materials (Daniels et al, 2012; Vachon & Hieronymus, 2017) and blunt intrusion tips and shear‐mode fractures.…”
Section: Magma Emplacement Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations in strike and/or dip have also been observed along individual dykes, revealing a continuous zigzagging stepped geometry (Fig. 3a, c, e, g–i) and are probably equally related to the exploitation of joints (Martinez-Poza & Druguet, 2016). The joints/faults within the host granitic rocks and surrounding Upper Carboniferous strata were generated in an extensional regime in Late Carboniferous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, these joints/fractures could be deemed as the 'contemporaneous' products with dykes in central West Junggar. A plausible model is that 'contemporaneous' joints in the granitoids were exploited during dyke emplacement and subsequently reactivated during cooling and post-cooling events, implying active tectonics during and after the intrusion of the dyke swarm (Martinez-Poza & Druguet, 2016).…”
Section: D2 Emplacement Of Dykesmentioning
confidence: 99%