2008
DOI: 10.1080/00343400701861310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Strategy within Heterogeneity: Multiple Dimensions of Regional Networking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that cultural issues, the type of business, the economic setting, and the existing social capital may influence the form of local IFCs. In spite of that, it seems to be consensus in the literature that regardless of the way the IFC comes about in a cluster, it plays a vital role in managing interactions, sharing of knowledge and in providing a cognitive framework for transforming information into useful knowledge (Audretsch and Lehmann, 2006;Steiner and Ploder, 2008).…”
Section: Institutions For Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that cultural issues, the type of business, the economic setting, and the existing social capital may influence the form of local IFCs. In spite of that, it seems to be consensus in the literature that regardless of the way the IFC comes about in a cluster, it plays a vital role in managing interactions, sharing of knowledge and in providing a cognitive framework for transforming information into useful knowledge (Audretsch and Lehmann, 2006;Steiner and Ploder, 2008).…”
Section: Institutions For Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, many of the empirical TIM studies use case studies of (successful) localities and clusters as their research design (STEINER and PLODER, 2008) and therefore focus on interorganizational links within one (or a few) regions (SACCHETTI, 2009). This is striking as an emerging body of work conceptually argues (BATHELT et al, 2004;BOSCHMA, 2005) and empirically shows (GIULIANI, 2005;GRAF, 2011;IAMMARINO et al, 2008;MORRISON, 2008;KNOBEN, 2009) that especially ties with organizations outside the home region are sources of new knowledge due to their 'weak tie' or 'global pipeline' nature.…”
Section: Spatial Embeddedness Still Matter? Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregate cognitive mechanisms, in the form of improved mutual understanding (e.g. district economies), thick and dense social networks (relational capital), wise management of collective goods that prevents spoiling natural resources, and the efficient transfer of R&D results, all combine as a cognitive catalyst that optimizes the combination of physical factors and generates increasing returns (see also Bathelt and Gluckler 2003;Steiner and Ploder 2008). Therefore, it is not just aggregate human capital that determines the generation of increasing returns to individual education, but also the regional endowment of cognitive capital.…”
Section: A Model For Cognitive Capital and Spatial Knowledge Spilloversmentioning
confidence: 99%