1980
DOI: 10.1086/283634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Stability in Natural and Randomly Constructed Competitive Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
130
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The method employs a bootstrap randomization of the raw data (predator × prey matrix) to generate a distribution of overlap indices reflecting the null hypothesis of no consistent diet composition within predators. We employed a randomization scheme whereby zeros in the predator-prey matrix were retained in their origi- (Lawlor 1980, Winemiller & Pianka 1990). The algorithm randomly rearranges the proportions (e.g., p ik in Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method employs a bootstrap randomization of the raw data (predator × prey matrix) to generate a distribution of overlap indices reflecting the null hypothesis of no consistent diet composition within predators. We employed a randomization scheme whereby zeros in the predator-prey matrix were retained in their origi- (Lawlor 1980, Winemiller & Pianka 1990). The algorithm randomly rearranges the proportions (e.g., p ik in Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, diet data from stations where two or more fish species were caught together was treated separately in order to investigate whether cooccurrence influenced prey selection and diet overlap on fine scale and obtain information about the station-to-station variability in diet and diet overlap. In order to test for significance, the proportion of a given prey group in a given diet was randomized according to the Randomization Algorithm (RA2) of Lawlor (1980) and iterated 1000 times for each comparison of diet overlap using EcoSim v.7.72 (Gotelli & Entsminger 2004). Lawlor (1980) described four randomization algorithms (RA1ÁRA4) for niche overlap in which the zero states, i.e.…”
Section: Diet Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to test for significance, the proportion of a given prey group in a given diet was randomized according to the Randomization Algorithm (RA2) of Lawlor (1980) and iterated 1000 times for each comparison of diet overlap using EcoSim v.7.72 (Gotelli & Entsminger 2004). Lawlor (1980) described four randomization algorithms (RA1ÁRA4) for niche overlap in which the zero states, i.e. the empty prey groups, and the niche breadth, i.e.…”
Section: Diet Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of resources can be influenced by spatial and temporal physical variables (Lawlor, 1980) and the presence or absence of vegetation cover which can affect the density of resources (Pinto and Uieda, 2007). Some studies have demonstrated that fish select food resources based on their availability in the environment (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%