2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017ja024180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Properties of the Foreshock at Venus

Abstract: The interaction of the solar wind with Venus is dominated by the planet's ionosphere that acts as an obstacle to the flow resulting in an induced magnetosphere and bow shock much smaller than their terrestrial counterparts. This study presents a 3‐D electromagnetic hybrid (kinetic ions and fluid electrons) simulation of the solar wind interaction with an unmagnetized obstacle to examine the structure and properties of the Cytherean foreshock during periods of near radial IMF, that is, when it lies upstream of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the distinction between HFA and SHFA is entirely due to the presence or absence of such an associated IMF discontinuity, by definition, these HFA‐like events must be classified as SHFAs. This conclusion is further supported by our hybrid simulations [ Omidi et al , ] which predict that SHFAs can form in the foreshocks of unmagnetized planets through the same mechanism as at Earth (i.e., the interaction of foreshock cavitons with the bow shock), and our observations at Mars and Venus are consistent with that predicted by this simulation. Through first‐order estimation of the size of the events with respect to the local proton gyroradius, we find that the Venusian SHFA was effectively larger than the Martian event (≈19 gyroradii versus ≈7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Given that the distinction between HFA and SHFA is entirely due to the presence or absence of such an associated IMF discontinuity, by definition, these HFA‐like events must be classified as SHFAs. This conclusion is further supported by our hybrid simulations [ Omidi et al , ] which predict that SHFAs can form in the foreshocks of unmagnetized planets through the same mechanism as at Earth (i.e., the interaction of foreshock cavitons with the bow shock), and our observations at Mars and Venus are consistent with that predicted by this simulation. Through first‐order estimation of the size of the events with respect to the local proton gyroradius, we find that the Venusian SHFA was effectively larger than the Martian event (≈19 gyroradii versus ≈7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In particular, SHFAs have recently been observed and modelled in the foreshock upstream of Venus and Mars Omidi et al, 2017). These works show that the size and properties of SHFAs, as well as their formation mechanism, are similar to that at Earth.…”
Section: Blanco-cano Et Al: Cavitons and Spontaneous Hot Flow Anomentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In particular, SHFAs have recently been observed and modeled in the foreshock upstream of Venus and Mars Omidi et al, 2017). These works show that the size and properties of SHFAs, as well as their formation mechanism, are similar to that at Earth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%