2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6533-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and properties of multi-walled carbon nanotube porous sheets with enhanced elongation

Abstract: In this article, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs)/dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid (DBSA) porous sheet networks (PSNs) of enhanced extensibility were developed and characterized. The MWNT/DBSA networks possess failure strains of 8-12 %, markedly higher than the literature reported values of 0.5-4 %. The networks were prepared through micro-filtration of highly dispersed MWNT in DBSA aqueous solutions. The DBSA molecule has two functions: In the dispersion stage, DBSA functions as a dispersant leading to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where v PPS , v Cf and v BP are the volume fraction of PPS, CF and BP in the composite; ρ PPS is the density of the PPS and equals to 1.35 g cm −3 ; ρ CF is the density of the CF and equals to 1.77 g cm −3 ; ρ PPS/CF is the density of the PPS/CF composite, which is obtained by dividing the mass of a composite sample by its volume; w PPS and w CF are the weigh fraction of the PPS and CF in the composite. For the (5), ρ PPS/BP/CF is the density of PPS/CF/BP composite, which is obtained by dividing the mass of a composite sample by its volume; w BP is the weight fraction of the BP in the composite and ρ BP is the density of the as-prepared BP, which is estimated to be 0.46 g cm −3 , agree with the BP density reported in the literature [32,34]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to compare the impregnation grade between the PPS, BP and CF reinforcement and the composites defects, this was carried out in a FEI Inspect S50 microscopy.…”
Section: Calculation Of Density and Porosity Of The Composite Laminatesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Where v PPS , v Cf and v BP are the volume fraction of PPS, CF and BP in the composite; ρ PPS is the density of the PPS and equals to 1.35 g cm −3 ; ρ CF is the density of the CF and equals to 1.77 g cm −3 ; ρ PPS/CF is the density of the PPS/CF composite, which is obtained by dividing the mass of a composite sample by its volume; w PPS and w CF are the weigh fraction of the PPS and CF in the composite. For the (5), ρ PPS/BP/CF is the density of PPS/CF/BP composite, which is obtained by dividing the mass of a composite sample by its volume; w BP is the weight fraction of the BP in the composite and ρ BP is the density of the as-prepared BP, which is estimated to be 0.46 g cm −3 , agree with the BP density reported in the literature [32,34]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to compare the impregnation grade between the PPS, BP and CF reinforcement and the composites defects, this was carried out in a FEI Inspect S50 microscopy.…”
Section: Calculation Of Density and Porosity Of The Composite Laminatesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Incorporation of nano‐sized fillers, in polymers is generally referred to as nanocomposites. Nanocomposites have attracted great interest due to their wide possible range of applications and commercial opportunities . Nano filler not only improve the mechanical properties but also restrained the deterioration of outdoor application properties and increased the thermal stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in thermal stability are due to structural differences observed in the HRSEM micrographs. The precipitation‐filtration route included purging of unbound DBSA from the solution by methanol, thus resulted in a stiffer network, a more thermo‐stable product .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%