2007
DOI: 10.1134/s0018143907060070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and properties of electron-beam irradiated potato starch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no bands typical for carboxyl or carbonyl groups could be detected in our recorded FTIR spectra, it might be viable the formation of a negligible amount of such functional groups. This presumption is supported by previous results [41] demonstrating that insignificant amount of oxidized groups in potato starch has been produced without substantial change in the chemical composition of macromolecules, as indicated by the identical IR spectra of native and e-beam-irradiated starch (110-440 kGy).…”
Section: Degradation Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although no bands typical for carboxyl or carbonyl groups could be detected in our recorded FTIR spectra, it might be viable the formation of a negligible amount of such functional groups. This presumption is supported by previous results [41] demonstrating that insignificant amount of oxidized groups in potato starch has been produced without substantial change in the chemical composition of macromolecules, as indicated by the identical IR spectra of native and e-beam-irradiated starch (110-440 kGy).…”
Section: Degradation Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…There are reported several studies related to starch treatment with ionizing radiation, especially with gamma radiation (MacArthur & D'Appolonia, 1984;Sokhey et al, 1993;Kang et al, 1999;Wu et al, 2002;Ezekiel et al, 2007). Recently, information regarding starch treatment with electron beam (e-beam) in different irradiation dose range, either at low or relative high doses (0 -25 kGy) (De Kerf et al, 2001;Pimpa et al, 2007) or at very high doses (> 50 kGy) (Kamal et al, 2007;Shishonok et al, 2007) were reported. The studies concerning the effects of ionizing radiation were performed on starches extracted from various vegetal sources such as corn (Kang et al, 1999;De Kerf et al, 2001;Adeil Pietranera & Narvaiz, 2001), wheat (MacArthur & D'Appolonia, 1984;Koksel et al, 1996), potato (Ezekiel et al, 2007;Shishonok et al, 2007), barley endosperms (Faust & Massey Jr., 1966), rice (Wu et al, 2002;Bao et al, 2005) or sago (Pimpa et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, information regarding starch treatment with electron beam (e-beam) in different irradiation dose range, either at low or relative high doses (0 -25 kGy) (De Kerf et al, 2001;Pimpa et al, 2007) or at very high doses (> 50 kGy) (Kamal et al, 2007;Shishonok et al, 2007) were reported. The studies concerning the effects of ionizing radiation were performed on starches extracted from various vegetal sources such as corn (Kang et al, 1999;De Kerf et al, 2001;Adeil Pietranera & Narvaiz, 2001), wheat (MacArthur & D'Appolonia, 1984;Koksel et al, 1996), potato (Ezekiel et al, 2007;Shishonok et al, 2007), barley endosperms (Faust & Massey Jr., 1966), rice (Wu et al, 2002;Bao et al, 2005) or sago (Pimpa et al, 2007). The reported data showed that ionizing radiation treatment generates free radicals on starch molecules that can alter their size and structure (Raffi et al, 1980;Ciesla et al, 1991;Grant & D' Appolonia, 1991;Sabularse et al, 1991;Sokhey et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The irradiated native Hylon VII starches had RC values of 19.54 and 17.47% for 30 and 60 kGy irradiation doses, respectively. Decrease in RC due to irradiation has been reported for maize , octenyl succinylated high amylose rice, and potato starches. However, Lee et al reported that there was no change in RC of normal corn/maize starch irradiated at doses between 0 and 40 kGy, eventhough there was starch depolymerization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%