2004
DOI: 10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121[0088:saoocb]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Organization of Canopy Bird Assemblages in Central Amazonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that the natural heterogeneity found in a tropical forest can affect the local composition of animal and plant communities [17,21,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. Although we found that none of the variables analyzed were significantly associated with the number of bird species (richness) and individuals (abundance) recorded either on mist-nets or acoustic surveys, we found significant relationships between at least three parameters (elevation, distance to the nearest stream, and depth of the leaf litter) and bird species composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that the natural heterogeneity found in a tropical forest can affect the local composition of animal and plant communities [17,21,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. Although we found that none of the variables analyzed were significantly associated with the number of bird species (richness) and individuals (abundance) recorded either on mist-nets or acoustic surveys, we found significant relationships between at least three parameters (elevation, distance to the nearest stream, and depth of the leaf litter) and bird species composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These species seem to be generally rare or locally uncommon in central Amazonia [14], independently of the conservation condition of the forest. In fact, virtually all species considered vulnerable to fragmentation or sensitive to fragment area [47] were found at the RFAD [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the detection of these birds is usually compromised, which leads to an underestimation of richness and abundance of species associated with higher forest strata (Walther, 2003;Derlindati and Caziani, 2005;Anderson, 2009). Studies that directly access canopy birds generally involve observations from towers placed at the height of emergent trees (Greenberg, 1981;Loiselle, 1988;Naka, 2004;Anderson and Naka, 2011), platforms (Bouricius et al, 2002;Peña-Foxon and Díaz, 2012) and walkways, where mist nets can also be employed (Rahman, 2002), or cranes with more sophisticated technology (Shaw, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birds were also categorized according to seven habitat categories within Twin Cays. These categories were adapted and modified from schemes of Naka (2004). They are: (1) AIR =overhead; (2) AQU = aquatic; (3) AQUE = aquatic edge; (4) AQUF = aquatic fields (mud flats, wet sandy beaches and marshy fields); (5) C = canopy; (6) U = lower strata (understory and midstory); (7) A = found anywhere within the understory and canopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%