2010
DOI: 10.1096/fj.10-155614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and mechanism of calmodulin binding to a signaling sphingolipid reveal new aspects of lipid‐protein interactions

Abstract: Lipid-protein interactions are rarely characterized at a structural molecular level due to technical difficulties; however, the biological significance of understanding the mechanism of these interactions is outstanding. In this report, we provide mechanistic insight into the inhibitory complex formation of the lipid mediator sphingosylphosphorylcholine with calmodulin, the most central and ubiquitous regulator protein in calcium signaling. We applied crystallographic, thermodynamic, kinetic, and spectroscopic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH profiles of ferricyanide and cyt c therefore give a clear indication that divalent cations support adoption of a closed conformation by the DH and the CYT when the domain interface becomes negatively charged at neutral/alkaline pH. This effect is not caused by the presence of distinct binding sites for divalent cations, as these were not found in our docking models of the DH and the CYT, and the 30–60 m m concentration of dications required to achieve the optimal effect is magnitudes higher than the reported affinities for Ca 2+ specific EF‐hand binding sites, for example (2.1 μ m or 0.49 μ m ). The high concentration required suggests unspecific shielding of close opposing charges at both sides of the domain interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The pH profiles of ferricyanide and cyt c therefore give a clear indication that divalent cations support adoption of a closed conformation by the DH and the CYT when the domain interface becomes negatively charged at neutral/alkaline pH. This effect is not caused by the presence of distinct binding sites for divalent cations, as these were not found in our docking models of the DH and the CYT, and the 30–60 m m concentration of dications required to achieve the optimal effect is magnitudes higher than the reported affinities for Ca 2+ specific EF‐hand binding sites, for example (2.1 μ m or 0.49 μ m ). The high concentration required suggests unspecific shielding of close opposing charges at both sides of the domain interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Protein/peptide interactions with nucleic acids Lipid/membrane interactions Polysaccharide interactions …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(vii) Lipid/membrane interactions. [325][326][327][328][329][330][331][332][333][334][335][336][337][338][339][340][341] (viii) Polysaccharide interactions. (ix) Protein/peptide interactions with polymers and nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a structure has been reported of Ca 2+ -CaM bound to a sphingolipid, with no peptidyl moiety attached [59]. CaM adopted a collapsed conformation with open hydrophobic pockets forming a hydrophobic channel that accommodated four molecules of sphingosylphophorylcholine, with its alkyl chains arranged in a parallel orientation.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cam Bound To Myristoylated Versus Farnesylatedmentioning
confidence: 99%