2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.3691243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and magnetic properties of Y1−xLuxFeO3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) ceramics

Abstract: Polycrystalline Lu-doped YFeO3 samples with perovskite structure were synthesized by solid-state reaction. Powder X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive X-ray analysis manifest the high quality of the samples. Room temperature 57Fe Mössbauer spectra indicate that only the Fe3+ exists in the samples, which excludes the formation of multiple valence of Fe. The large effective magnetic moments of Fe3+ obtained from the temperature dependence of magnetization data can be explained i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural refinement has confirmed the space group of orthorhombic Eu-doped BiFeO 3 is Pn2 1 a [14], suggesting the space group of orthorhombic Bi 1.04Àx Y x FeO 3 should be Pn2 1 a. [19]. YFeO 3 is a canted antiferromagnet with weak saturate magnetization of about 0.18 emu/g, which is smaller than that of Bi 0.74 Y 0.30-FeO 3 (0.31 emu/g).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The structural refinement has confirmed the space group of orthorhombic Eu-doped BiFeO 3 is Pn2 1 a [14], suggesting the space group of orthorhombic Bi 1.04Àx Y x FeO 3 should be Pn2 1 a. [19]. YFeO 3 is a canted antiferromagnet with weak saturate magnetization of about 0.18 emu/g, which is smaller than that of Bi 0.74 Y 0.30-FeO 3 (0.31 emu/g).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…We have, again, a compressive strain which leads to an increase of J d between the Fe ions, in comparison to the undoped case J b , where J d > J b . The Fe-O-Fe superexchange interaction can affect the magnetization of Er-doped YFO [13]. This leads to an enhancing of M s (see Figure 4, curve 2), which is in a good qualitative concordance with the results of Cheng et al [11].…”
Section: Er Substitution At the Y Sitesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The doping of YFO with different ions-magnetic or nonmagnetic-can improve its magnetic, electric and dielectric properties. Many authors have studied the changes in the properties of YFO which occur though the substitution of different ions on Y-, Fe-or both sites in YFO bulk and nanoparticles [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The doping ions have different ionic radii in comparison with the host ions, which leads to strains and to modification of the properties after ion doping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature reports have shown several instances where the dielectric and magnetic properties of YFO ceramic could be improved by doping with suitable ions . Donor dopant Ti 4+ at Fe 3+ introduces polarizable nature and can modify the magnetic as well as the dielectric properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The literature reports have shown several instances where the dielectric and magnetic properties of YFO ceramic could be improved by doping with suitable ions. [10][11][12] Donor dopant Ti 4+ at Fe 3+ introduces polarizable nature and can modify the magnetic as well as the dielectric properties. Here, we chose the donor dopant Ti 4+ at Fe 3+ site in YFO and attempted to study its influence on the electrical and magnetic properties of YFO ceramics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%