Bacillus anthracis genome harbors a toxin-antitoxin (TA) module encoding pemI (antitoxin) and pemK (toxin). This study describes the rPemK as a potent ribonuclease with a preference for pyrimidines (C/U), which is consistent with our previous study that demonstrated it as a translational attenuator. The in silico structural modeling of the PemK in conjunction with the site-directed mutagenesis confirmed the role of His-59 and Glu-78 as an acid-base couple in mediating the ribonuclease activity. The rPemK is shown to form a complex with the rPemI, which is in line with its function as a TA module. This rPemIrPemK complex becomes catalytically inactive when both the proteins interact in a molar stoichiometry of 1. The rPemI displays vulnerability to proteolysis but attains conformational stability only upon rPemK interaction. The pemI-pemK transcript is shown to be up-regulated upon stress induction with a concomitant increase in the amount of PemK and a decline in the PemI levels, establishing the role of these modules in stress. The artificial perturbation of TA interaction could unleash the toxin, executing bacterial cell death. Toward this end, synthetic peptides are designed to disrupt the TA interaction. The peptides are shown to be effective in abrogating TA interaction in micromolar range in vitro. This approach can be harnessed as a potential antibacterial strategy against anthrax in the future.
Toxin-antitoxin (TA)3 modules in prokaryotes consist of two adjacent open reading frames encoding a stable toxin and a cognate labile antitoxin (1, 2). The vulnerability of antitoxin to proteolysis demands a constant de novo synthesis of antitoxin to maintain a steady-state level that can sequester the toxin and circumvent its deleterious activity (3). A negative feedback homeostatic loop also exists, wherein antitoxin acts as a transcriptional repressor in conjunction with the toxin as a co-repressor (4). A multitude of functions have been ascribed to the chromosome-encoded TA loci, primarily as stress managers (5-7). It has been envisaged that these modules respond to intracellular stress facilitating phenotypic switching of the bacterial cell to a quasidormant stage amenable to survival under extreme conditions (8 -12). However, a recent study demonstrates that TA loci do not impart selective advantage to the cells grown in stress, indicating that these genes can innocuously be deleted from the genome (13).Several families of two component TA loci have been identified on bacterial chromosomes, namely relBE, higBA, mazEF, ccdAB, vapBC, parDE, phd-doc, and yoeB-yefM. The toxins of these families share sequence and structural similarity to some extent, but the corresponding antidotes do not, thus indicating their distinct evolutionary origin (2). However, despite their structural similarity and common ancestral origin, their downstream targets are quite different. CcdB and ParE function as gyrase poison, whereas MazF, Kid, YdcE, and YoeB are potent ribonucleases (14 -22). VapC toxins represent a structurally dist...