2008
DOI: 10.18814/epiiugs/2008/v31i1/012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and evolution of the continental margin off Norway and the Barents Sea

Abstract: The Norwegian Margin formed in response to early Cenozoic continental breakup and subsequent opening of the Norwegian-Greenland Sea. There is a welldefined margin segmentation and the various segments are characterized by distinct crustal properties, structural and magmatic styles, and post-opening history of vertical motions. The sedimentary basins at the conjugate continental margins off Norway and Greenland and in the western Barents Sea developed as a result of a series of post-Caledonian rift episodes unt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
375
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 410 publications
(383 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
7
375
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because Scandinavia's offshore margin structure is well known from seismic-refraction and seismic-refl ection studies (Raum et al, 2002;Mjelde et al, 2003;Ebbing et al, 2006;Faleide et al, 2008;Ebbing and Olesen, 2010;Reynisson, 2010, and citations therein), our measurements can be made with confi dence. However, like several other passive margins, the Scandinavian margin is characterized by lower-crustal bodies (LCBs) exhibiting seismic velocities higher than expected for the lower crust and lower than expected for the mantle (see Eldholm and Mutter, 1986;Ebbing et al, 2006).…”
Section: Crustal Taper and Escarpment Elevations In Scandinaviamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Scandinavia's offshore margin structure is well known from seismic-refraction and seismic-refl ection studies (Raum et al, 2002;Mjelde et al, 2003;Ebbing et al, 2006;Faleide et al, 2008;Ebbing and Olesen, 2010;Reynisson, 2010, and citations therein), our measurements can be made with confi dence. However, like several other passive margins, the Scandinavian margin is characterized by lower-crustal bodies (LCBs) exhibiting seismic velocities higher than expected for the lower crust and lower than expected for the mantle (see Eldholm and Mutter, 1986;Ebbing et al, 2006).…”
Section: Crustal Taper and Escarpment Elevations In Scandinaviamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low sea-level, aridity and rifting resulted in the widespread terrestrial clastic deposits with red beds and evaporites in Central and Western Europe during the Early Triassic (Ziegler 1982;Ronov et al 1989). Mixed coarse and fine-grained clastics prevailed on the Barents shelf (Rønnevik et al 1982;Johansen et al 1993;Bogatski et al 1996;O'Leary et al 2004;Faleide et al 2008;Riis et al 2008;Tugarova et al 2008). Marginal marine environment with clastic deposition existed in the seaway between Europe and Greenland (Stemmerik 2000).…”
Section: Upper Absaroka I: Ladinian (Induan-lower Carnian) 251-225 Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alaska, Sverdrup, and Barents Sea) contain black shales that have source rock potential (Leith et al 1993;Parrish et al 2001). In general, mixed coarse and fine-grained clastics were deposited on the Barents shelf (Rønnevik et al 1982;Johansen et al 1993;Bogatski et al 1996;O'Leary et al 2004;Faleide et al 2008;Riis et al 2008;Tugarova et al 2008). Terrestrial clastics were deposited on Siberia, while a marine environment prevailed in the Verkhoyansk area (Ronov et al 1989).…”
Section: Upper Absaroka Ii: Norian (Late Carnian -Middle Hettangian)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that Svalbard, displaying a transect of Caledonian structures (Harland, 1985), remained adjacent to NE Greenland until the NE Atlantic began to open means that the route of our supposedly Devonian separation traversed the Barents Sea shelf also. That would explain this gap in the Caledonian orogen, a gap traversed by several Late Paleozoic rift structures (Faleide et al, 2008). Reconstruction with this in mind suggests that Greenland's southwestward motion along the MTFZ may be marked on Greenland by the NE-trending line of Cretaceous basalts that passes through Wollaston Foreland, central East Greenland (Escher and Pulvertaft, 1995); this movement, perhaps limited to <100 km, was followed by a much bigger northward (present Scandinavian coordinates) one, which would provide the Svalbard-Tromsø(?)…”
Section: Western Gneiss Region (Wgr) Southwestern Norwaymentioning
confidence: 99%