2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08457.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and evolution of low-mass W Ursae Majoris type systems - II. With angular momentum loss

Abstract: In a previous paper, using Eggleton's stellar evolution code we have discussed the structure and evolution of low‐mass W Ursae Majoris (W UMa) type contact binaries without angular momentum loss (AML). The models exhibit cyclic behaviour about a state of marginal contact on a thermal time‐scale. Part of the time of each cycle is spent in contact and part in a semidetached state. According to observations, W UMa systems suffer AML. We present the models of low‐mass contact binaries with AML due to gravitational… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass contained in the convective envelope of the primary in the good contact phase is slightly more than that in the poor thermal contact phase, and the mass contained in the convective envelope of the secondary in the good contact state is much less than that in the poor thermal contact configuration (see Figs 4c and d). This is caused by the variation of the radiative temperature gradient due to energy transfer between the two components in the common envelope (Li et al 2004b). Because part of the luminosity of the primary is transferred to the secondary in a contact system, the radiative temperature gradient of the primary increases slightly, and the increase of the radiative temperature gradient in the surface layers of the primary drives part of radiative zone to be convective.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mass contained in the convective envelope of the primary in the good contact phase is slightly more than that in the poor thermal contact phase, and the mass contained in the convective envelope of the secondary in the good contact state is much less than that in the poor thermal contact configuration (see Figs 4c and d). This is caused by the variation of the radiative temperature gradient due to energy transfer between the two components in the common envelope (Li et al 2004b). Because part of the luminosity of the primary is transferred to the secondary in a contact system, the radiative temperature gradient of the primary increases slightly, and the increase of the radiative temperature gradient in the surface layers of the primary drives part of radiative zone to be convective.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is caused by the increase of the radiative temperature gradient due to more luminosity loss from the primary. The mass contained in the convective envelope of the secondary in good contact evolution is much less than that in poor thermal contact evolution because of the decrease of the radiative temperature gradient in the secondary owing to more luminosity transfer from the primary to the secondary (Li et al 2004b) in good contact state. Meanwhile, it is seen in Fig.…”
Section: Influence Of Energy Transfer On the Convective Envelopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these objects the energy transfer rate appears to be less efficient than in other types of contact binaries. They also show excess angular momentum, which can be understood as resulting from the first stages of the interaction between the components (see Li et al 2004, and references therein). The overall properties of TYC 2675-663-1 suggest a system at or near contact and perhaps in the early stages of evolution toward a state of full geometrical and thermal contact (coalescence).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great part of observed contact binaries are low-mass binaries (W UMa-type systems). The study of the structure and evolution of low-mass contact binary systems has attracted much attention during the last decades [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, a number of contact binaries with massive and middle-mass components have been found by astronomical observations in the past years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%