2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Dynamics of RNA Repeat Expansions That Cause Huntington’s Disease and Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1

Abstract: RNA repeat expansions cause a host of incurable, genetically defined diseases. The most common class of RNA repeats consists of trinucleotide repeats. These long, repeating transcripts fold into hairpins containing 1 × 1 internal loops that can mediate disease via a variety of mechanism(s) in which RNA is the central player. Two of these disorders are Huntington’s disease and myotonic dystrophy type 1, which are caused by r(CAG) and r(CUG) repeats, respectively. We report the structures of two RNA constructs c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the structure of a target RNA is too dynamic, ligand binding potential could be diminished as a defined small-molecule binding pocket may not be present or the affinity for an ill-defined pocket could be low due to the energetic and entropic penalties associated with locking out multiple conformations. Previous studies have provided some insight into RNA structural dynamics; for example, smaller loops are not typically as conformationally dynamic as their larger counterparts and U-rich motifs can have dynamic character 22 , 24 . We were interested in whether the SMIRNAs studied herein had a preference for dynamic or structurally well-defined loops.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the structure of a target RNA is too dynamic, ligand binding potential could be diminished as a defined small-molecule binding pocket may not be present or the affinity for an ill-defined pocket could be low due to the energetic and entropic penalties associated with locking out multiple conformations. Previous studies have provided some insight into RNA structural dynamics; for example, smaller loops are not typically as conformationally dynamic as their larger counterparts and U-rich motifs can have dynamic character 22 , 24 . We were interested in whether the SMIRNAs studied herein had a preference for dynamic or structurally well-defined loops.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…influences the intramolecular structures that can be adopted by the repeat (e.g. 22), which in turn can influence transcription, translation, and binding to various RNA binding proteins. GC-rich sequences are more prone to adopt highly stable intramolecular folds that bind RNA-binding proteins (eg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate studying the binding interactions of the RNA motif and AstraZeneca small molecule libraries, we used an approach dubbed AbsorbArray, where the small molecules are absorbed onto agarose-coated microarrays allowing for spatial encoding. 14 The arrays were then probed for binding to radiolabeled RNA motif libraries in the presence of 100-fold excess of unlabeled competitor oligonucleotides that mimic the constant regions in the library (1-5), DNA (6,7), and tRNA (8) (Fig. 1A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have provided some insight into RNA structural dynamics such as smaller loops are not typically as conformationally dynamic as their larger counterparts and U-rich motifs can have dynamic character. 18,20 We were therefore interested in if the SMIRNAs studied herein had a preference for dynamic or structurally well-defined loops. Fortuitously, a set of structurally related small molecules had overlap in the RNAs that they preferred to bind and those that they discriminated against.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation