1997
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6881570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and amount of genetic variation at minisatellite loci within the subspecies complex of Phoca vitulina (the harbour seal)

Abstract: The structure and amount of genetic variation within and between three subspecies of the harbour seal Phoca vitulina was assessed by multilocus DNA fingerprinting. Bandsharing similarity indicates that the subspecies Phoca vitulina richardsi (Alaska, East Pacific) is clearly separated from the other two subspecies, Phoca vitulina concolor (Sable Island, West Atlantic) and Phoca vitulina vitulina (North Sea, East Atlantic). The subspecies also differ significantly in the estimated amount of heterozygosity. Phoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The misclassification of calls classified to neighboring nongenetically distinct populations provides further evidence for regionally distinctive vocalizations. These results are in general agreement with the findings of genetic structure of harbor seal populations at oceanic and regional levels ͑Lamont et Stanley et al, 1996;Kappe et al, 1997;Goodman, 1998;Burg et al, 1999͒. Since harbor seals are regionally philopatric on the scale of several hundred kilometers, mixing between populations is likely to be limited and genetic barriers between harbor seal populations appear to present a likely explanation for most of the observed vocal variation displayed in this species. Using the 1-SE rule ͓i.e., the smallest tree for which the cross-validated relative error rate is within one standard error of the minimum ͑De'ath and Fabricius, 2000͔͒ suggests that the appropriate descriptive tree was one with ten nodes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The misclassification of calls classified to neighboring nongenetically distinct populations provides further evidence for regionally distinctive vocalizations. These results are in general agreement with the findings of genetic structure of harbor seal populations at oceanic and regional levels ͑Lamont et Stanley et al, 1996;Kappe et al, 1997;Goodman, 1998;Burg et al, 1999͒. Since harbor seals are regionally philopatric on the scale of several hundred kilometers, mixing between populations is likely to be limited and genetic barriers between harbor seal populations appear to present a likely explanation for most of the observed vocal variation displayed in this species. Using the 1-SE rule ͓i.e., the smallest tree for which the cross-validated relative error rate is within one standard error of the minimum ͑De'ath and Fabricius, 2000͔͒ suggests that the appropriate descriptive tree was one with ten nodes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…1, All sites from which harbor seals were recorded, except those in California and Eastern Canada, form genetically discrete populations ͑Lamont et Stanley et al, 1996;Kappe et al, 1997;Goodman, 1998;Burg et al, 1999͒. Sites were arranged into groups and populations according to Stanley et al ͑1996͒ to allow direct comparison between vocal and genetic variation ͑Table II͒.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1994) who, using minisatellite fingerprinting, also revealed high levels of variation in the root vole. Also, studies on the harbour seal Phoca vitulina demonstrated a complete absence of allozyme variation at 24 loci, but significant levels of variation at both minisatellite and microsatellite loci ( Kappe et al . 1995, 1997 ; Swart et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bandsharing coefficient was calculated by comparing fingerprints of similar intensity run in adjacent lanes (Fig. Covariance of overlapping similarities was estimated using all possible pairwise combinations sharing one individual (Kappe, Bijlsma et al, 1997). Within the range of 3-20 kb a total of 37 informative bands were resolved.…”
Section: Dna Fingerprinting Inbreeding and Genetic Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%