1983
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3093(83)90013-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure analysis of MgSiO3 glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
34
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
12
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accord with precious molecular dynamic simulations of Mg2SiO4 melt structure (Matsui et al 1982), and with x-ray diffraction measurements on both magnesium silicate glasses and melts (Waseda and Toguri 1977;Yin et al 1983). Additionally, however, some SiaO7 groups are also present within the glass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is in accord with precious molecular dynamic simulations of Mg2SiO4 melt structure (Matsui et al 1982), and with x-ray diffraction measurements on both magnesium silicate glasses and melts (Waseda and Toguri 1977;Yin et al 1983). Additionally, however, some SiaO7 groups are also present within the glass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Figure 5 shows these functions for interionic distances between S i -O , M g -O and O -O ionic pairs. The assignment of peaks is consistent with the interpretation of Yin et al (1983). A discrepancy does exist, however, regarding the contribution at ~2.5 ~.…”
Section: Gu(r)=4npr 2 Drsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A discrepancy does exist, however, regarding the contribution at ~2.5 ~. Yin et al (1983) state that the MgO peak is a doublet with the main peak at 2.08 Yin et al (1983) structure analysis is illustrated in plots (a) and (e). Total correlation function intensity at 2.5 A is predicted by this study to involve O -O distances (e) whereas the X-ray diffraction study interpreted M g -O distances to be the cause for intensity at 2.5 ~ in Fig.…”
Section: Gu(r)=4npr 2 Drmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Discrepancies in peak width and intensity reflect inaccurate reproduction of bond length and bond angle distributions. Yin et al (1983) report a density of 2.54 g/cm 3 for MgSi03 glass at 300 K, but the MD results plotted here are for a density of 2.75 g/cm 3 as reported by Yoder (1976) and confirmed by Bass (personal communication). The density change does not have a large effect on the predicted TCF and the results are very similar for either density.…”
Section: General Features Of Melt and Glass Structuresupporting
confidence: 62%