2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure–Affinity Relationships (SARs) and Structure–Kinetics Relationships (SKRs) of Kv11.1 Blockers

Abstract: Kv11.1 (hERG) blockers with comparable potencies but different binding kinetics might display divergent pro-arrhythmic risks. In the present study, we explored structure-kinetics relationships in four series of Kv11.1 blockers next to their structure-affinity relationships. We learned that despite dramatic differences in affinities and association rates, there were hardly any variations in the dissociation rate constants of these molecules with residence times (RTs) of a few minutes only. Hence, we synthesized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3C and 3D). Such correlation between affinity and on-rates has been reported in the case of other GPCRs [40] and ion channels [41, 42]. However, in the current study, variations in association rate constants were approximately 10-fold (logk on : 5.0 to 6.0), much smaller than at the other targets mentioned above.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…3C and 3D). Such correlation between affinity and on-rates has been reported in the case of other GPCRs [40] and ion channels [41, 42]. However, in the current study, variations in association rate constants were approximately 10-fold (logk on : 5.0 to 6.0), much smaller than at the other targets mentioned above.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In previous studies, such a separation has explained the different therapeutic effects molecules exhibit highlighting the benefits of such an in-depth analysis. 35 , 36 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characterization of the drug-target complex lifetime or RT in early phases of the drug discovery and development process might help to improve the prediction of in vivo efficacy and safety 12–15 . Evidence from retrospective studies has shown that several marketed drugs exhibit a long RT on their target 13, 29 , prompting the prospective optimization of both affinity and kinetic properties of compounds for a variety of targets 17, 25, 3032 . In this regard, 15a was discovered by optimizing a reported lead in the development of MK-0812, a Merck CCR2 antagonist that has failed in clinical trials due to lack of efficacy 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%