1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6343(1999)5:2<79::aid-bspy2>3.3.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure/activity studies of the anti‐MUC1 monoclonal antibody C595 and synthetic MUC1 mucin‐core‐related peptides and glycopeptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All glycosylated peptides showed distinctly decreased reactivity with mAb HMFG1, while monoglycosylation showed no effect and di-or triglycosylation enhanced the reactions with mAb C595 compared to the non-glycosylated peptide. Circular dichroism studies revealed that a lefthanded polyproline II helix adopted by this peptide in solution is further stabilized by addition of the GalNAc residues [55]. Another set of peptides and glycopeptides was used to study a large number of anti-MUC1 monoclonal antibodies recognizing peptidic epitopes in the same immunodominant MUC1 region [56,57].…”
Section: Effects Of Glycosylation On Peptidic Epitopes Of Glycoproteinssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…All glycosylated peptides showed distinctly decreased reactivity with mAb HMFG1, while monoglycosylation showed no effect and di-or triglycosylation enhanced the reactions with mAb C595 compared to the non-glycosylated peptide. Circular dichroism studies revealed that a lefthanded polyproline II helix adopted by this peptide in solution is further stabilized by addition of the GalNAc residues [55]. Another set of peptides and glycopeptides was used to study a large number of anti-MUC1 monoclonal antibodies recognizing peptidic epitopes in the same immunodominant MUC1 region [56,57].…”
Section: Effects Of Glycosylation On Peptidic Epitopes Of Glycoproteinssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In simple structure-activity relationship studies, several Pro residues, including Pro9 in apidaecin, were found to be responsible for the antibacterial activity of the peptide [49,89]. Consecutive prolines in a sequence usually assume a lefthanded polyproline II helix structure, as was shown for the classical examples, the mucins [90]. Indeed, circular dichroism spectra of Bac-5 [63,91] and PR-39 [74] resemble that of polyproline II helices [92].…”
Section: Conformation and Role Of The Proline Residuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, no significant secondary structure was detected for the polyproline II helical mucin peptides by NMR [90] and, likewise, the predominantly unordered structure of drosocin as detected by NMR [95] may, but not necessarily, reflect the presence of an underlying polyproline II helix conformation. In support of this, energy calculations of Bac-5 suggest a structure more extended than that of a polyproline II helix [91].…”
Section: Conformation and Role Of The Proline Residuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attachment of three GalNAc residues to a 25-mer mucin peptide is sufficient to increase both the population of peptides adopting a polyproline II (PPII) helix conformation and the binding of the monoclonal antibody C595. [234] A similar result was obtained by Karsten and co-workers who examined the binding of 28 Asp-Thr-Arg (DTR)-specific anti-MUC 1 antibodies to 12 synthetic MUC 1 20-and 21-mers containing T-and T N antigens at varying positions. [235] The DTR motif is a preferred target for the majority of the peptide-specific anti-MUC 1 antibodies.…”
Section: Chembiochem 2000 1 214 ± 246mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…[234] Fluorescence binding quenching studies with the monoclonal antibody C595, which recognises a Pro-Asp-Thr-Arg (PDTR) epitope, showed that the introduction of three GalNAc residues at threonines 9 and 21 and at serine 20 increased the MUC 1 peptide ± antibody association constant (150 versus 151, Figure 10). Interestingly, this increase appeared to coincide with a population increase of the PPII helix conformation as indicated by CD spectroscopy in cryogenic mixtures.…”
Section: Chembiochem 2000 1 214 ± 246mentioning
confidence: 97%