1996
DOI: 10.1016/0960-894x(95)00573-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure activity relationships of tetrahydrocannabinol analogues on human cannabinoid receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
80
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The binding data for compounds that bind to CB 2 reported so far (24)(25)(26)(27)(28), as well as for HU-308 in the present paper, indicate that major differences exist between the structure-activity relationships (SAR) for binding to CB 1 and CB 2 . Although a free phenolic group in cannabinoid-type compounds is a basic structural feature for CB 1 binding and cannabimimetic activity (29), it is not required for CB 2 binding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The binding data for compounds that bind to CB 2 reported so far (24)(25)(26)(27)(28), as well as for HU-308 in the present paper, indicate that major differences exist between the structure-activity relationships (SAR) for binding to CB 1 and CB 2 . Although a free phenolic group in cannabinoid-type compounds is a basic structural feature for CB 1 binding and cannabimimetic activity (29), it is not required for CB 2 binding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…24). Most of these compounds exhibit only modest selectivity (25)(26)(27). Of particular relevance to the present work are cannabinoid-type compounds, such as L-758,656 and L-759,633, in which the phenolic group is blocked as a methyl ether.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies have explored the role of oxygen in CB 2 binding. Synthesis of a series of ⌬ 8 -THC analogs in which the phenolic hydroxyl at position 1 was removed (deoxy-⌬ 8 -THC analogs) or replaced with a methoxyl resulted in analogs with selectivity for CB 2 receptors (Gareau et al, 1996;Huffman et al, 1996Huffman et al, , 1999. Incorporation of an oxygen into a fourth ring attached at C1 also increased CB 2 selectivity, suggesting possible differences in the interaction of oxygen in the binding pockets of CB 1 and CB 2 receptors (Reggio et al, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methylation of the phenols of the resorcinols drastically decreased or eliminated CB 1 affinity, perhaps because hydrogen donation is less likely from a methoxy group than from the free hydroxyl group of ⌬ 9 -THC (B. R. Martin, unpublished observations). Similarly, methoxy substitution for the phenolic hydroxyl in the methyl esters of ⌬ 8 -and ⌬ 9(11) -THC-dimethylheptyl resulted in analogs that were CB 2 -selective and had little CB 1 affinity (Gareau et al, 1996;Huffman et al, 1999;Ross et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that compounds lacking the phenolic hydroxyl of the A ring or having it occupied in an ether linkage, show enhanced affinity for CB2 as well as selectivity. 167 The observations made with these modifications indicate the involvement of additional specific electronic and steric factors in ligand recognition at the CB2 receptor. It is also important to note that elimination of the B ring of the classical cannabinoid core with the biphenyl or triaryl core has resulted in compounds that are more CB2 selective also.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%