2008
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.31.473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-Activity Relationships of Receptor Binding of 1,4-Dihydropyridine Derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the phenyl ring was replaced with different heteroatomic rings; some of these derivatives demonstrated modified tissue selectivity or the potency [30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Voltage-gated Calcium Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the phenyl ring was replaced with different heteroatomic rings; some of these derivatives demonstrated modified tissue selectivity or the potency [30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Voltage-gated Calcium Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An aryl group in the 4-position of the 1,4-DHP ring is essential for optimal activity (Shaldam et al, 2014). One study showed that an aryl ring with halogen or other electron-withdrawing groups exhibits higher receptorbinding activity (Takahashi et al, 2008). On the 1,4-DHP ring, ester groups are usually substituted at the 3-and 5-positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 H]NMS in the rat brain homogenates were examined. Although the lower urinary tract is clinically important target of SPE, in this study, the brain tissue was used because of a similarity between brain and lower urinary tract of pharmacological agents and SPE in binding affinities of a 1 -adrenergic, muscarinic and 1,4-DHP receptors 10,20,21) and also because of less amount of nonspecific binding for each radioligand in the brain compared to the bladder and prostate. SPE (10-200 mg/ml) inhibited specific [ 3 H]prazosin binding in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%