2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.09.12.459978
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-activity relationships of B.1.617 and other SARS-CoV-2 spike variants

Abstract: The surge of COVID-19 infection cases is spurred by emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants such as B.1.617. Here we report 38 cryo-EM structures, corresponding to the spike protein of the Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), Delta (B.1.617.2) and Kappa (B.1.617.1) variants in different functional states with and without its receptor, ACE2. Mutations on the N-terminal domain not only alter the conformation of the highly antigenic supersite of the Delta variant, but also remodel the glycan shield by deleting or adding N-glycans o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
39
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Cai et al have reported that the affinity of the Beta S to monomeric ACE2 (K D = 71.4 nM) increased as compared to that of the G614 S (K D = 124.0 nM) 30 . It should be mentioned that, for a given variant S protein, its absolute K D values generated from different studies 29,30,[42][43][44][45][46] , including two studies recently reported on BioRxiv 57,58 , may vary significantly, likely due to multiple factors such as the method used (BLI or SPR), S protein construct (full-length S or prefusion-stabilized S ectodomain), ACE2 form (monomeric or dimeric), the protein used to load the sensors (ACE2 or S), and even binding temperature. For example, it has been reported that the full-length G614 S had a K D value of 12.8 nM to dimeric ACE2 but its K D value to monomeric ACE2 was 124 nM 30 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Cai et al have reported that the affinity of the Beta S to monomeric ACE2 (K D = 71.4 nM) increased as compared to that of the G614 S (K D = 124.0 nM) 30 . It should be mentioned that, for a given variant S protein, its absolute K D values generated from different studies 29,30,[42][43][44][45][46] , including two studies recently reported on BioRxiv 57,58 , may vary significantly, likely due to multiple factors such as the method used (BLI or SPR), S protein construct (full-length S or prefusion-stabilized S ectodomain), ACE2 form (monomeric or dimeric), the protein used to load the sensors (ACE2 or S), and even binding temperature. For example, it has been reported that the full-length G614 S had a K D value of 12.8 nM to dimeric ACE2 but its K D value to monomeric ACE2 was 124 nM 30 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enhanced mobility of this functional RBD region is important to enable spontaneous transitions between the closed and open forms required for engagement with the ACE2 receptor. It is worth noting that the conformational dynamics profiles also revealed the increased thermal "breezing" that is spread across both S1 and S2 subunits in the S-B.1.1.7 and S-B.1.351 closed states (Figure 2A), providing support for the notion that these mutational variants may perturb and destabilize the closed form, thereby shifting the equilibrium to a more dynamic open form [34][35][36]. The root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) profiles for the 1 RBD-up open states were similar for S-G614 and S-B.1.1.7 conformations, while larger fluctuations were observed in the S-B.1.351 structure (Figure 2B).…”
Section: Atomistic Modeling and Simulations Reveal Distinct Conformational Flexibility Patterns Of The Sars-cov-2 S Mutant Variantsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A significant heterogeneity and plasticity of the conformational landscapes for the SARS-CoV-2 S proteins was recently unveiled in the large-scale structural investigation that reported 38 cryo-EM structures of the B.1.351, B.1.1.28/P.1, B.1.617.2 (Delta), and B.1.617.1 (Kappa) variants, featuring a broad spectrum of the RBD-up conformations intrinsically present in the apo form [36]. In particular, S-B.1.351 variant displayed a highly populated fully open state with all three RBDs in the up conformation in addition to significant fractions of the partially open states (1 RBD-up or 2 RBD-up) [36]. Importantly, among all the examined variants only S-B.1.351 exhibited a fully open 3 RBD-up conformation that resembles the structure of the fully open S-G614 variant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation is due to the Gaussian representation currently required by the underlying TensorFlow system." implemented on cryoSparc (Punjani et al, 2017), another package as popular as Relion, it has received wide attention in the cryo-EM community to make immediate impact on COVID-19 research (Yang et al, 2021). It is also noted that a PCA approach developed by Stark group with implementation on COW has been available (Haselbach et al, 2017) for facilitating investigation on conformation dynamics (Haselbach et al, 2017) or energy landscape (Haselbach et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%