Clinical and Experimental Toxicology of Organophosphates and Carbamates 1992
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-7506-0271-6.50012-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-activity relationships and anticholinesterase activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The molecular structure of OP and carbamate pesticides is an important factor in determining their reactivity with AChE [28,29]. The molecular configuration as well as the atomic composition of OPs and carbamates will influence characteristics such as electrophilicity and hydrophobicity, which are directly related with the rate of AChE inhibition [29]. These characteristics also will influence pesticide binding with esterases other than AChE [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular structure of OP and carbamate pesticides is an important factor in determining their reactivity with AChE [28,29]. The molecular configuration as well as the atomic composition of OPs and carbamates will influence characteristics such as electrophilicity and hydrophobicity, which are directly related with the rate of AChE inhibition [29]. These characteristics also will influence pesticide binding with esterases other than AChE [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident that LD50 of heptenophos is about 10 times higher than in the other two organophosphorus compounds tested. This finding should be ascribed to complex interactions of numerous factors such as electronic effects, hydrophobicity, steric effects, ionic bonds, toxicokinetic properties and non-anticholinesterase effects (Maxwell & Lenz 1992).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, P¼O compounds are generally more potent than P¼S compounds because the greater electronegativity of O weakens the P¼X bond, thereby enhancing binding to acetylcholinesterase; compounds that have longer n-alkyl R groups are generally more potent than those that have shorter n-alkyl groups because their greater hydrophobicity enhances binding to acetylcholinesterase. Compounds that have less bulky R or X groups are generally more potent than those that have bulkier groups hindering interaction with acetylcholinesterase (2,32). Differences in binding affinity for other esterases relative to acetylcholinesterase and in the rate and degree of binding reversibility and aging of phosphorylated acetylcholinesterase also impact potency.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Structural characteristics such as the lability of the P¼X bond and the overall hydrophobicity and steric characteristics of the molecule determine binding affinity (2,32). For example, P¼O compounds are generally more potent than P¼S compounds because the greater electronegativity of O weakens the P¼X bond, thereby enhancing binding to acetylcholinesterase; compounds that have longer n-alkyl R groups are generally more potent than those that have shorter n-alkyl groups because their greater hydrophobicity enhances binding to acetylcholinesterase.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%