2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.10.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-activity relationship of the ionic cocrystal: 5-amino-2-naphthalene sulfonate·ammonium ions for pharmaceutical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrophilic reactivity is represented by the negative potential, while the nucleophilic reactivity is denoted by the positive potential. 40 The values of MEP are closely related to the strength of intermolecular interactions between 2 molecules and could be used as an indicator to evaluate the possibility of formation of multicomponent solids such as co-crystals and salts. 41 The MEP mapped on the vdW surface of DAP and coformer molecules where red color represents the positive potential and cyan represents the negative potential (Fig.…”
Section: Molecular Electrostatic Potential (Mep) Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrophilic reactivity is represented by the negative potential, while the nucleophilic reactivity is denoted by the positive potential. 40 The values of MEP are closely related to the strength of intermolecular interactions between 2 molecules and could be used as an indicator to evaluate the possibility of formation of multicomponent solids such as co-crystals and salts. 41 The MEP mapped on the vdW surface of DAP and coformer molecules where red color represents the positive potential and cyan represents the negative potential (Fig.…”
Section: Molecular Electrostatic Potential (Mep) Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEPs mapped on the molecular surface provide clear information in terms of the electrophilic and nucleophilic attack regions of the molecule. The electrophilic reactivity is represented by the negative potential, while the nucleophilic reactivity is denoted by the positive potential . The values of MEP are closely related to the strength of intermolecular interactions between two molecules and are critical for understanding and evaluating the formation possibility of multicomponent crystals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The electrophilic reactivity is represented by the negative potential, while the nucleophilic reactivity is denoted by the positive potential. 57 The values of MEP are closely related to the strength of intermolecular interactions between two molecules and are critical for understanding and evaluating the formation possibility of multicomponent crystals. Figure 11 shows the MEPs mapped on van der Waals (vdW) surface of APZ and coformer molecules, where the red color represents the value of positive potential, the blue color represents the negative potential value, and the black color represents the calculated pK a value.…”
Section: Molecular Electrostatic Potential Surface (Meps)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…MEPs has often been used as a straightforward interpretative tool for understanding and predicting the intermolecular interactions in organic crystal structures. It identifies the sites of electrophilic (the negative potential) and nucleophilic (the positive potential) attack and shows the state prior to crystal formation. MEP analysis was employed to investigate the reason behind the difference in formation of salts and cocrystals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%