2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure–activity considerations and in vitro approaches to assess the genotoxicity of 19 methane-, benzene- and toluenesulfonic acid esters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PEDOT oxidation is performed in the presence of alcohol polymerization or post implantation may induce the formation of sulphonic acid esters. In particular, methyl and ethyl methanesulphonate esters are known genotoxins and carcinogens in rats and mice (IARC 2004), whereas the toxicity of p-toluene sulphonate esters has been generally established (Glowienke et al 2005). Unfortunately, these materials are not selective enough for neurons and over time the neural signal decreases.…”
Section: Tissue Engineering Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEDOT oxidation is performed in the presence of alcohol polymerization or post implantation may induce the formation of sulphonic acid esters. In particular, methyl and ethyl methanesulphonate esters are known genotoxins and carcinogens in rats and mice (IARC 2004), whereas the toxicity of p-toluene sulphonate esters has been generally established (Glowienke et al 2005). Unfortunately, these materials are not selective enough for neurons and over time the neural signal decreases.…”
Section: Tissue Engineering Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceptable (maximum) daily intake (ADI) and duration of exposure Acceptable (maximum) daily intake (ADI) and duration of exposure 64 weeks ADI = 120 lg While this is a general guidance, some classes of bacterial mutagens (e.g., many sulfonic acid esters) may be missed by this approach since they require higher concentrations to be detected in the bacterial reverse mutation test (Glowienke et al, 2005) and they are considered to be trans-species rodent carcinogens (Ashby and Paton, 1993;Matthews et al, 2005). Hence, an evaluation of the available literature data on compounds with similar structures must be made when judging the adequacy of evaluating impurities as part of the API.…”
Section: Concentration Of Impurity (%) Concentration Of Impurity (Ppm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When choosing between pharmacologically active and tested and other forms of biologic agents that are not bioequivalent such as Imatib, consideration must also be given to patient safety, which may be impacted by product degradation and the associated generation of impurities. This is of particular concern with imatinib as the active ingredient is a mesylate salt [5,8], and degradation byproducts such as mesylate esters of methanesulfonic acid are known to be highly genotoxic [9]. This case report suggests that switching from the pharmacologically active and tested form of imatinib (Glivec Ò ) to a copy product may compromise efficacy and could have multiple negative impacts on long-term patient outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%