1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-61159-9_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structuration Sets with Implication Intensity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a rule R of the form R → R , it takes into account the implicative intensity between the rules of degree 1 composed of one attribute of R and one of R : ϕ g (R) = Max i≤k;j ≤h ϕ a i , a j hk . c R .c R 1/2 (8) with the same notations as definition 3.4. The major loop of the algorithm is bounded by the maximal height h max of the hierarchy.…”
Section: The Agglomerative Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a rule R of the form R → R , it takes into account the implicative intensity between the rules of degree 1 composed of one attribute of R and one of R : ϕ g (R) = Max i≤k;j ≤h ϕ a i , a j hk . c R .c R 1/2 (8) with the same notations as definition 3.4. The major loop of the algorithm is bounded by the maximal height h max of the hierarchy.…”
Section: The Agglomerative Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjective aspect (userdriven) takes into account the prior knowledge and the goal of the users [19], and the objective aspect (data-driven) gives priority to statistical criteria [11]. In this paper, we focus on a statistical measure, the implicative intensity [7,8], which is an adaptation of the likelihood linkage coefficient [18] to the non-symmetrical relationships. Basically, this measure aims at expressing the surprise of a user faced with a new quasiimplication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) The intensity of implication ϕ(X → Y ) measures the "surprise" of having few counter-examples for the X → Y rule as compared with a random law. This measure was introduced by Gras [12] to improve the evaluation of rule confidence. The basic idea of intensity of implication is to compare the number of counter-examples N (g(X), g(Y )) of the rule X → Y with the expected number N (U, U ) where U and U are two randomly selected subsets of O considered to be equals to respectively |g(X)| and |g(Y )|.…”
Section: Statistical Measures Of Rule Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%