2018
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201801398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structurally-Constrained 3D Anisotropic CSEM Resistivity Inversion with Crossgradient Criterion: Proof-Of-Concept Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Industry benchmarking in 2017 revealed inconsistencies in horizontal and vertical resistivity distributions from anisotropic 3D CSEM inversion models produced by the major service providers for a given field dataset used for the test; invited academic practitioners abstained from the test [13]. This provided the motivation for the development of a crossgradientbased anisotropic-resistivity-imaging algorithm that directly enforces structural similarity between the horizontal and vertical resistivity models without control from seismic or well data [4,14,15]. The seismic, image-guided anisotropic 3D inversion of CSEM and MT data is an adaption of this crossgradient philosophy, in which the structural controls from seismic or other images are infused in the anisotropic resistivity inversion process [7,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Industry benchmarking in 2017 revealed inconsistencies in horizontal and vertical resistivity distributions from anisotropic 3D CSEM inversion models produced by the major service providers for a given field dataset used for the test; invited academic practitioners abstained from the test [13]. This provided the motivation for the development of a crossgradientbased anisotropic-resistivity-imaging algorithm that directly enforces structural similarity between the horizontal and vertical resistivity models without control from seismic or well data [4,14,15]. The seismic, image-guided anisotropic 3D inversion of CSEM and MT data is an adaption of this crossgradient philosophy, in which the structural controls from seismic or other images are infused in the anisotropic resistivity inversion process [7,[16][17][18].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first method, the MT and CSEM data are inverted for the vertical and horizontal resistivities directly while imposing a crossgradient constraint to ensure the structural similarity between the models [14,15]. The objective function to minimize can be stated as…”
Section: Geologically Consistent 3d Anisotropic Resistivity Inversion...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraints may also be applied to favour similarities between local variations in the vertical and horizontal models (Meju et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introduction Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smoothing is typically done along the horizontal and vertical axes but can also be modified to follow horizons or seismic events (Causse et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2017; Wiik et al., 2015) or can be reduced or suppressed across horizon boundaries (Hoversten et al., 2015). Constraints may also be applied to favour similarities between local variations in the vertical and horizontal models (Meju et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%