2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-018-2092-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural variations of cotton cellulose nanocrystals from deep eutectic solvent treatment: micro and nano scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
44
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…NC showed peaks at 14.1°, 16.1° and 22.4°. Those peaks correspond to 0, 110 and 020 lattice planes of the cellulose I crystalline form [ 20 , 21 ]. The locations of peaks were similar to those of plant celluloses [ 15 , 16 ] and BC [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]; however, their diffraction peaks were relatively less sharp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NC showed peaks at 14.1°, 16.1° and 22.4°. Those peaks correspond to 0, 110 and 020 lattice planes of the cellulose I crystalline form [ 20 , 21 ]. The locations of peaks were similar to those of plant celluloses [ 15 , 16 ] and BC [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]; however, their diffraction peaks were relatively less sharp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ling et al modified cotton fibers ( Gossypium hirstum L.) using choline chloride/oxalic acid dihydrate in various molar ratios (1: 1; 1: 2; and 1: 3) at 80 °C or 100 °C, and 1:100 hydro modulus [118]. Subsequently, the treated fibers were subjected to high-power ultrasonic homogenization (300 W, 20 kHz, 1 h).…”
Section: Deep Eutectic Solvents For Isolation Of Nanocellulosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1d–f showed the SEM images, exhibiting the rod‐like shape of CNCs with about 300–450 nm length, which confirmed their successful extraction from grape pomace. Remarkably, the morphology of CNCs was not affected by increasing the hydrolysis time, and the longer hydrolysis time can contribute to isolate smaller CNCs 78. The average diameter of extracted CNCs samples was determined by analyzing the high‐magnification SEM images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%