2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.862772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Variation of Plastomes Provides Key Insight Into the Deep Phylogeny of Ferns

Abstract: Structural variation of plastid genomes (plastomes), particularly large inversions and gene losses, can provide key evidence for the deep phylogeny of plants. In this study, we investigated the structural variation of fern plastomes in a phylogenetic context. A total of 127 plastomes representing all 50 recognized families and 11 orders of ferns were sampled, making it the most comprehensive plastomic analysis of fern lineages to date. The samples included 42 novel plastomes of 15 families with a focus on Hyme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We recover (P, (D, e)) with moderate support (BS 92%); this topology agrees with other phylogenomic studies based on whole plastomes (Lu et al, 2015; Lehtonen and Cárdenas, 2019) and nuclear data (Rothfels et al, 2015; Qi et al, 2018; Shen et al, 2018), as well as a plastid supermatrix (Lehtonen, 2011). The whole plastome study of Du et al (2021) recovered a novel topology comprising ((D, P), e) under some analysis settings but (P, (D, e)) under others; a similar study with expanded sampling generally supported ((D, P), e) (Du et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We recover (P, (D, e)) with moderate support (BS 92%); this topology agrees with other phylogenomic studies based on whole plastomes (Lu et al, 2015; Lehtonen and Cárdenas, 2019) and nuclear data (Rothfels et al, 2015; Qi et al, 2018; Shen et al, 2018), as well as a plastid supermatrix (Lehtonen, 2011). The whole plastome study of Du et al (2021) recovered a novel topology comprising ((D, P), e) under some analysis settings but (P, (D, e)) under others; a similar study with expanded sampling generally supported ((D, P), e) (Du et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While manual inclusion lists are not an ideal long-term solution because they cannot grow with GenBank, this case demonstrates that such lists are a reasonable option for taxonomically difficult groups, and more importantly, the improvement that can result from input from taxonomic experts. Another example of the advantage of a continuously updated tree is the publication of 42 additional fern plastome samples while this paper was in revision (Du et al, 2022). While we were unable to integrate these data into the current version of FTOL, they will be automatically added when the next version of GenBank data is released, and we expected the next version of FTOL will reflect this new knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, there might be a concerted loss of ndh -related genes in both genomic compartments ( Figure 4 ), a feature that has been suggested to be the initial (but irreversible) step toward mycoheterotrophy in flowering plants ( Graham et al, 2017 ; Lin et al, 2017 ). Interestingly, a separate fern lineage Stromatopteris (Gleicheniaceae), which also produces mycoheterotrophic gametophytes ( Bierhorst, 1971b ), has likewise experienced ndh gene losses in the plastome ( Du et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these genes do not seem to be associated with the specialization of gametophytic lifestyle in Schizaeaceae, and are mostly considered to have minor functions in the plastid. For instance, rps16 has been lost several times in ferns ( Zhang et al, 2014 ; Kuo et al, 2018a ; Du et al, 2022 ). Ycf94 , which was recently identified in plastomes of seed-free plants and whose function is still unknown ( Song et al, 2018 ), seems to be absent only in Schizaeaceae ( Du et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation