2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1828-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural variant calling: the long and the short of it

Abstract: Recent research into structural variants (SVs) has established their importance to medicine and molecular biology, elucidating their role in various diseases, regulation of gene expression, ethnic diversity, and large-scale chromosome evolution—giving rise to the differences within populations and among species. Nevertheless, characterizing SVs and determining the optimal approach for a given experimental design remains a computational and scientific challenge. Multiple approaches have emerged to target variou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
423
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 465 publications
(438 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
8
423
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Structural variants (SVs) are genomic rearrangements affecting the presence, position or direction of a nucleotide sequence, including deletions, duplications, insertions, inversion or translocations (Mahmoud et al, 2019). SVs are pervasive variants that shape genome architecture and they can cover a larger proportion of genetic variation than SNPs (Redon et al, 2006;Wellenreuther et al, 2019;Catanach et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural variants (SVs) are genomic rearrangements affecting the presence, position or direction of a nucleotide sequence, including deletions, duplications, insertions, inversion or translocations (Mahmoud et al, 2019). SVs are pervasive variants that shape genome architecture and they can cover a larger proportion of genetic variation than SNPs (Redon et al, 2006;Wellenreuther et al, 2019;Catanach et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different SV datasets clearly have different advantages and disadvantages. For example, genome alignments can be poor for detecting heterozygous SVs, because primary assemblies ignore alternative haplotypes (66); they tend to be best at identifying large SV events, such as large insertions (67). In contrast, SMRTread mapping should be efficient for most SV detection, outperforming short-read data (58,68).…”
Section: Svs Across Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around half of all detected, high-confidence SV events 115 (46.8 to 53.2 % across the 12 genotypes) ranged in size from ~100-1000 bp ( Supplementary 116 Table S2). These small SV represent a novel genetic diversity resource that was previously 117 unnoticed due to the insufficient resolution of high-throughput genotyping platforms such as 118 SNP genotyping arrays and a very high false-positive rates (up to 89%) of short-read 119 sequencing data (Mahmoud et al, 2019;Sedlazeck et al, 2018). 120…”
Section: Introduction 43mentioning
confidence: 99%