2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.115123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural uncertainty estimation through a Craig-Bampton Stochastic Method optimisation in satellites structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the covariance matrix of a random field is defined in the regular geometric space domain, the eigenvalues and eigenvectors can be easily obtained. The detailed solution process of autocorrelation matrix is as follows [ 5 ]. whereby the autocovariance function is bounded, symmetric, and positive definite, which ensures that the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions have the following properties: (1) the set of eigenfunctions is orthogonal and complete; (2) for each eigenvalue , there are at most a limited number of linearly independent eigenfunctions; (3) there is at most one countable infinite set of eigenvalues; (4) all of the eigenvalues are positive real numbers; (5) the autocovariance function can be decomposed into the following forms: …”
Section: Representation Of the Uncertainty With Random Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the covariance matrix of a random field is defined in the regular geometric space domain, the eigenvalues and eigenvectors can be easily obtained. The detailed solution process of autocorrelation matrix is as follows [ 5 ]. whereby the autocovariance function is bounded, symmetric, and positive definite, which ensures that the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions have the following properties: (1) the set of eigenfunctions is orthogonal and complete; (2) for each eigenvalue , there are at most a limited number of linearly independent eigenfunctions; (3) there is at most one countable infinite set of eigenvalues; (4) all of the eigenvalues are positive real numbers; (5) the autocovariance function can be decomposed into the following forms: …”
Section: Representation Of the Uncertainty With Random Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gorman and Yu [ 4 ] reviewed the method of superposition in vibration analysis of plates and shells, especially focusing on the Gorman method for accurate establishment of eigenvalues and mode shapes in free vibration analysis of rectangular plates. Although the system variables of the concerned structures are broadly accounted for as deterministic, it has been demonstrated that the fluctuation, i.e., uncertainties, of these parameters inevitably and inherently correlated to the structural modelling and analysis process [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. The complexity of the actual structural material properties and various random errors during the manufacturing process will result in uncertainty of the structural parameters, such as vibration of the machine tool, random variation in the temperature during processing, etc., which will cause uncertainty among a group of structural components with the same nominal size that are manufactured with the same material and the same processing method [ 8 ] and ultimately lead to random fluctuation of material properties around the mean value and a certain correlation between the fluctuation and machining dimension direction [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teng et al [39] have studied the evolution of localized crack growth by introducing an acoustic data-driven deviation detection method based on statistical probability models called the consensus self-organizing models (COSMO). De Lellis et al [40] have computed perturbation parameters associated with structural impairments by applying a classic Craig-Bampton Approach version's stochastic version. e researchers have argued that this method can be constructed as an optimization black box technique for enhancing the model correlating with investigated data with the use of the finite element model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%