1999
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.68.2755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Transitions and Localization in La2-x-yNdySrxCuO4withp1/8

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of La 2−x−y Nd y Sr x CuO 4 , where crystals first became available, the drop in resistivity for x = 0.12 and y տ 0.2 occurs at a relatively low temperature and does not depend much on the direction in which the current flows; however, the resistive drop does tend to occur at a temperature significantly higher than the bulk onset of diamagnetism. 70,71 The diamagnetism can be a bit tricky to measure because of the large paramagnetic response of the Nd moments; 72 nevertheless, Ding et al 73 recently measured the anisotropy of the diamagnetic response in La 1.6−x Nd 0.4 Sr x CuO 4 with x = 0.10, 0.15, and 0.18. The results for x = 0.15 look quite similar to those for LBCO, with a diamagnetic response in Ќ , but not ʈ , starting at 21 K, followed by a 3D diamagnetic transition at ϳ13 K, where ab effectively reaches zero.…”
Section: G Specific Heatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of La 2−x−y Nd y Sr x CuO 4 , where crystals first became available, the drop in resistivity for x = 0.12 and y տ 0.2 occurs at a relatively low temperature and does not depend much on the direction in which the current flows; however, the resistive drop does tend to occur at a temperature significantly higher than the bulk onset of diamagnetism. 70,71 The diamagnetism can be a bit tricky to measure because of the large paramagnetic response of the Nd moments; 72 nevertheless, Ding et al 73 recently measured the anisotropy of the diamagnetic response in La 1.6−x Nd 0.4 Sr x CuO 4 with x = 0.10, 0.15, and 0.18. The results for x = 0.15 look quite similar to those for LBCO, with a diamagnetic response in Ќ , but not ʈ , starting at 21 K, followed by a 3D diamagnetic transition at ϳ13 K, where ab effectively reaches zero.…”
Section: G Specific Heatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The q-1d instability is, however, usually masked by the more prominent d-wave pairing instability. (3) Nonetheless, the presence of small extrinsic spatial anisotropy is sufficient for the q-1d state to manifest in the d-wave pairing state; as an origin of such anisotropy in LSCO systems, we may assume the lattice distortion due to the low-temperature tetragonal (LTT) structure [18][19][20] or its fluctuations. [21][22][23] (The q-1d instability of the FS, as well as its competing nature with d-wave pairing instability, has independently been found in the Hubbard model also by Halboth and Metzner.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of dFSD correlations, the shape of the FS in La-based cuprates may depend strongly on the crystal structure. [48] In the presence of the LTT structure, which was observed in LBCO [68], Nd-doped LSCO [69], and LSCO with x = 0.12 [70], we expect that dFSD correlations lead to a strongly deformed FS as shown in Fig. 2 through coupling to a small xy anisotropy of the lattice.…”
Section: A Magnetic Excitations In La-based Cupratesmentioning
confidence: 93%