2019
DOI: 10.1002/stc.2425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural system identification by measurement error‐minimizing observability method

Abstract: Summary This paper proposes a method for the finite element model updating using static load tests under the framework of observability analysis. Previous works included measurement errors in the coefficient matrix of the observability equations. This impeded the obtainment of accurate estimations. To deal with this issue, the proposed method relocates the errors and incorporates an optimization procedure to minimize the square sum of these errors. This method is able to identify the structural parameters of c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most known and commonly adopted approaches for optimal sensor placement was developed by Kammer [ 14 ]. Since then, several variants of this approach have been suggested to resolve the positioning of SSI sensors [ 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. However, no research works have noticed that the choice in the best position of the sensors might change when different sources of uncertainty are considered in the uncertainty analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most known and commonly adopted approaches for optimal sensor placement was developed by Kammer [ 14 ]. Since then, several variants of this approach have been suggested to resolve the positioning of SSI sensors [ 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. However, no research works have noticed that the choice in the best position of the sensors might change when different sources of uncertainty are considered in the uncertainty analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure16. Uncertainty distribution of Young's modulus E 2 and E 8 , prior and posterior PDF (grey line) of element Young's modulus according to[4], the red PDF by COM UQ analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, because of these simplifications, actual structures on site rarely correspond to the numerical models. In this case, to get a representative behavior of the structure, the calibration of the model parameters on site might be advised [4,5]. This calibration can use structural system identification (SSI) techniques to measure the actual response of the structure on site by Despite the many works published about this topic, many researchers agree that this procedure is still under development, and it is expected that huge technological progress will be made in the coming years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, because of these simplifications actual structures on site rarely correspond to the numerical models. In this case, to get a representative behavior of the structure, the calibration of the model parameters on site might be advised (Lei et al 2019). This calibration can use Structural System Identification (SSI) techniques to measure the actual response of the structure onsite by health monitoring systems (such as accelerometers, glass fiber wires or strain gauges).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%