Structural Synthesis and the Search for New Engineering Solutions in the Conceptual Design Phase

Pecheikina, M. A.; Rakov, Dmitry; Sukhorukov, R. Yu.

doi:10.3103/s1052618820080087

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 3 shows a coding scheme of the proposed solution that focuses on the components of 1) discourse organisation, such as the way the solution is structured or organised in the presentation, 2) product design, such as the detailed plan and specifications of a product to resolve a problem, 3) operational principles and processes, such as the workings, functionality, and implementation of the proposed product. The coding scheme was inspired by the work of mechanical and machinery engineering (e.g., Merticaru et al, 2015;Pecheikina et al, 2020;Scharfe & Wiener, 2020) that highlighted how the integration of engineering principles, methods, processes, and instruments contributes to the development of a product design and functionality to solve problems.…”

Section: Using Gestures Metaphoricallymentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-Speech Gestures in Enhancing Engineering Proposal Presentations: A Multimodal Analysis of ESP Spoken Discourse

Lee

2024

ESP Today

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Though gestures can convey the meaning of the message and the thoughts of the speakers, there are limited research studies on how co-speech gestures are used in presenting engineering-related messages. This case study aims to understand how four types of gestures (beat, deictic, iconic, and metaphoric) are used in engineering proposal presentations to convey technical solutions in proposed products. This study employed a mixed-method research approach of using both multimodal discourse analysis and quantitative analysis to examine the ways two student presenters used co-speech gestures to communicate technical solutions in engineering proposal presentations. The findings showed that iconic gestures were used most frequently by one presenter to mimic the visual representations of designs and processes in engineering systems, co-occurring with spoken language to reinforce the propositional content. Deictic gestures were used most frequently by another presenter in directing the audience's attention to visual figures to facilitate the explanation of technical content. In comparison, beat and metaphoric gestures were used less frequently. This case study informs multimodal research on ESP spoken discourse and provides pedagogical implications for the application of gestures to facilitate the communication of technical content and concepts in engineering presentations.

show abstract

Section: Using Gestures Metaphoricallymentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-Speech Gestures in Enhancing Engineering Proposal Presentations: A Multimodal Analysis of ESP Spoken Discourse

Lee

2024

ESP Today

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Морфологический анализ [7][8][9][10][11], основанный на построении морфологической матрицы (ММ), генерации возможных альтернатив и последующем выборе наилучшего решения из всего сгенерированного набора комбинаций эффективно применяется для синтеза и оценки ТР. Главная задача заключается в синтезе морфологического множества решений, т.е.…”

Section: морфологический анализunclassified

Algorithm of Engineering Decision Making at the Pre-Design Stage

Mitryaeva¹,

Pecheikina²,

Rakov³

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Аннотация. В статье рассматривается создание информационной среды для поддержки принятия решений при создании технических систем на стадии предэскизного проектирования. Особое место в жизненном цикле систем играет этап принятия концептуального решения с последующей оценкой. В статье рассматривается применение морфологического подхода для анализа, синтеза и прогнозирования инновационных решений. Морфологическое представление позволяет четко определить и структурировать информацию, сформировать и оценить морфологический набор возможных вариантов. Новизна метода заключается в использовании морфологического подхода и кластерного анализа для оценки и отбора. К преимуществам подхода относится относительная простота оценки генерируемых вариантов и выбора. В результате применения метода удалось значительно сократить время на анализ вариантов и принятие решения. Предлагаемый подход значительно повышает производительность процесса анализа, синтеза и принятия решений. Ключевые слова: технологические решения, предэскизное проектирование, морфологический подход.

show abstract

Classification and Analysis of Additive Technologies Based on the Morphological Approach

Rakov

Sukhorukov

2021

J. Mach. Manuf. Reliab.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Structural Synthesis and the Search for New Engineering Solutions in the Conceptual Design Phase

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Co-Speech Gestures in Enhancing Engineering Proposal Presentations: A Multimodal Analysis of ESP Spoken Discourse

Co-Speech Gestures in Enhancing Engineering Proposal Presentations: A Multimodal Analysis of ESP Spoken Discourse

Algorithm of Engineering Decision Making at the Pre-Design Stage

Classification and Analysis of Additive Technologies Based on the Morphological Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About