2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-020-01874-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural style and neotectonic activity along the Harz Boundary Fault, northern Germany: a multimethod approach integrating geophysics, outcrop data and numerical simulations

Abstract: We present new evidence for neotectonic activity along the Harz Boundary Fault, a Cretaceous reverse fault that represents a key structure in northern Germany. For the fault analysis, we use a multimethod approach, integrating outcrop data, luminescene dating, shear wave seismics, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and numerical simulations. A recent sinkhole at the SSW-ward dipping and WNW-ESE striking Harz Boundary Fault exposes a NNE-ward dipping and WNW-ESE striking planar fault surface that cuts thro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fault was developing synchronously with the SMF activity, which was revived in the Quaternary (see: Štěpančíková 2022). A comparable situation is described in Müller et al (2020) at the Harz Boundary Fault in northern Germany, where a large Mesozoic fault was reactivated due to GIA (glacial isostatic adjustment)-related stress field changes at the end of the Weischselian glaciation.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Lacustrine Sediment Deformationsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The fault was developing synchronously with the SMF activity, which was revived in the Quaternary (see: Štěpančíková 2022). A comparable situation is described in Müller et al (2020) at the Harz Boundary Fault in northern Germany, where a large Mesozoic fault was reactivated due to GIA (glacial isostatic adjustment)-related stress field changes at the end of the Weischselian glaciation.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Lacustrine Sediment Deformationsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, a detailed study of the stress changes induced by GIA with a realistic ice load model is required to identify the background stress states and draw conclusions on past, current and future seismicity. In addition, GIA stresses in the peripheral bulge have not been considered here, which could also have induced earthquakes during the last glacial cycle and which is indicated by potential GIFs in central to northern Germany (e.g., Brandes et al., 2012; Müller et al., 2020). Finally, we note that our modeling, which assumes a critically stressed crust, is able to explain the reactivation of pre‐existing, non‐optimally orientated faults due to a glacial cycle, that is, GIFs, independent if the background stress regime is of the thrust‐ or strike‐slip‐faulting type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geoelectrical data taken with measurement equipment such as the ABEM Terrameter LS, AGI SuperSting, GeoSys, GeoTom, IRIS Instrument Syscal Pro, Lippmann [17][18][19][20][21][22] have different output formats, and other formats, such as res2dinv [23], also exist. The pyBERT library available in the Anaconda distribution [24] uses the lines of code in Algorithm 1 to convert these different data formats and line-3 into UDF.…”
Section: Data Importmentioning
confidence: 99%