1990
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)81405-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural studies on three flavin‐interacting regions of the flavoprotein subunit of complex II in Ascaris suum mitochondria

Abstract: The flavoprotein (Fp) subunit of mitochondrial complex II contains covalently bound FAD as a prosthetic group. In this study, the primary structure of the flavin-bound tryptic peptide from the Fp subunit of Ascaris complex II was determined and found to be highly similar to those of the corresponding flavin-binding regions of bovine heart and bacterial Fp subunits. Furthermore, the Ascaris Fp subunit was shown to contain two regions exhibiting striking sequence similarity to the segments that have been predict… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can now be concluded that these enzyme complexes for fumarate reduction in eukaryotes differ significantly from the prokaryotic type of FRD since (i) all known primary structures of eukaryotic enzyme complexes functioning in vivo in the direction of fumarate reduction demonstrate a higher amino acid sequence similarity to mammalian and E. coli SDHs than to prokaryotic FRD (1,9,42,43); and (ii) eukaryotic complexes that reduce fumarate interact with a benzoquinone (rhodoquinone), whereas prokaryotic FRDs interact with a naphthoquinone (menaquinone). Therefore, in addition to the two known types of enzyme complexes in prokaryotes (SDH and FRD), which differ in primary structure, activity ratio of succinate oxidation and fumarate reduction, diode-like behavior, and interacting quinone, another type of complex exists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can now be concluded that these enzyme complexes for fumarate reduction in eukaryotes differ significantly from the prokaryotic type of FRD since (i) all known primary structures of eukaryotic enzyme complexes functioning in vivo in the direction of fumarate reduction demonstrate a higher amino acid sequence similarity to mammalian and E. coli SDHs than to prokaryotic FRD (1,9,42,43); and (ii) eukaryotic complexes that reduce fumarate interact with a benzoquinone (rhodoquinone), whereas prokaryotic FRDs interact with a naphthoquinone (menaquinone). Therefore, in addition to the two known types of enzyme complexes in prokaryotes (SDH and FRD), which differ in primary structure, activity ratio of succinate oxidation and fumarate reduction, diode-like behavior, and interacting quinone, another type of complex exists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%