2012
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.321307
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Studies on Molecular Interactions between Camel Peptidoglycan Recognition Protein, CPGRP-S, and Peptidoglycan Moieties N-Acetylglucosamine and N-Acetylmuramic Acid

Abstract: Background: PGRP-S is an innate immunity protein that protects hosts from invading microbes. Results: CPGRP-S forms linear polymers with alternating A-B and C-D contacts, and both GlcNAc and MurNAc bind at the same subsite. Conclusion:The mode of binding of camel PGRP-S is different from other PGRPs. Significance: The better antibacterial properties of camel PGRP-S can be exploited for therapeutic applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed forcep-like shape of the cleft formed by two α-helices Aα2 and Bα2 at the A–B contact provides features similar as that observed in the case of other fatty acid binding proteins [21], [22]. On the other hand the cleft at the C–D contact consists of a specific pocket for the recognition of glycan moieties such as GlcNAc and MurNAc [11]. In a contrast, it was shown in the structures of the complexes of PGRP-S domain of HPGRP-Iα and HPGRP-Iβ, that the peptide moiety of PGN was the initial element of recognition by the protein [23], [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed forcep-like shape of the cleft formed by two α-helices Aα2 and Bα2 at the A–B contact provides features similar as that observed in the case of other fatty acid binding proteins [21], [22]. On the other hand the cleft at the C–D contact consists of a specific pocket for the recognition of glycan moieties such as GlcNAc and MurNAc [11]. In a contrast, it was shown in the structures of the complexes of PGRP-S domain of HPGRP-Iα and HPGRP-Iβ, that the peptide moiety of PGN was the initial element of recognition by the protein [23], [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It has been shown by previous structural studies of binary complexes of CPGRP-S with LPS and SA [9][11] that LPS bound to CPGRP-S in the binding Site-1 at the C–D contact while SA was found to bind the protein in the binding Site-2 at the A–B contact [19]. Since the two binding sites were located distantly from each other, the surface plasmon resonance studies were carried out with both ligands separately as well as one after the other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is possible that the free Cys was not on the molecule surface; however, no structure is known to date. A second affinity constant for PGRP–PGN interaction was determined, suggesting a cooperative binding effect that would be caused by PGRP aggregation or binding of multiple PGRP molecules to each PGN molecule . In this sense, PGRP dimerization could have a physiological role in PGN recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The hydrophobic nature of the PGRP‐LB groove indicates that the back face would serve for subsequent signalling after PGRP molecule clustering by binding to polymeric cell wall components . Binding and crystallographic studies demonstrate that CPGRP‐S bind to lipopolysaccharide and PGN …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Docking of N-acetylmuramic acid (NAM) with Rv3717 was performed using the PatchDock server (Schneidman-Duhovny et al, 2005). Coordinates of NAM were obtained from the complex structure of the peptidoglycan-recognition protein in complex with NAM (PDB entry 3olk; Sharma et al, 2012). All parameters used for docking were the defaults of the PatchDock server.…”
Section: Docking Of Substrate With Rv3717mentioning
confidence: 99%