2009
DOI: 10.1134/s1028334x09080273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural specificity of pleistocene loess and soil formation of the southern Russian plain according to materials of Eastern Priazovie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Kamenka Interglacial was followed by a further cooling (MIS 8,. As to the subsequent warm interval marked by the Romny fossil soil formation (MIS 7,, it has been interpreted in two different ways -either as an interglacial (Bolikhovskaya 1995, Shik 2014, or as interstadial (Velichko et al 2009).…”
Section: Chronological Intervalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kamenka Interglacial was followed by a further cooling (MIS 8,. As to the subsequent warm interval marked by the Romny fossil soil formation (MIS 7,, it has been interpreted in two different ways -either as an interglacial (Bolikhovskaya 1995, Shik 2014, or as interstadial (Velichko et al 2009).…”
Section: Chronological Intervalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory has been universally accepted (Basarin et al 2014;Novothny et al 2011;Heller and Evans 1995). In China, Eastern Europe and Azov sea, magnetic susceptibility has a positive correlation with intensity of pedogenesis, low in loess layers, but high in paleosols (Heller et al 1991;Marković et al 2008;Velichko et al 2009a). This phenomenon is explained by the fact that there are more finegrained magnetite and maghemite grains formed in the process of pedogenesis (Zhou et al 1990).…”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples for pollen analysis and for dating by radiocarbon and Optical Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) methods were taken where appropriate. Soil complexes (SC) in the outcrops were identified according to the typology of the fossil soils in the region [31,32]. The paleogeographic reconstructions based on palynological data, especially those using the paleofloristic method [33][34][35], provided the landscape-climatic background for the geomorphological investigations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key instrument for assessing the geochronology of ancient erosion features in the Azov Sea area is loess-soil stratigraphy. Layers of loess of different ages are separated by horizons of well-distinguished fossil soils, presumably formed during interglacial and large interstadial intervals of the Pleistocene, correlated with warm marine isotope stages and substages [31,32]. It is possible to identify the specific features of paleosoils of different ages based on their typical morphology and correlation with the chronostratigraphic scheme of loess-soil series of the East European Plain [31,32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation