2016
DOI: 10.1070/rm9688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural sparsity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monotone classes of graphs which have modeling limits (of which graphing limits are a particular case) were characterized in [26] and coincides with nowhere dense classes (of graphs). This also coincides (in the case of monotone classes of graphs) with the notion of NIP and stable classes, see [1] (see also [23]). For hereditary classes the structure theory and the existence of modeling limits is more complicated (see [22]) and local-global convergence seems to provide a useful framework.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Monotone classes of graphs which have modeling limits (of which graphing limits are a particular case) were characterized in [26] and coincides with nowhere dense classes (of graphs). This also coincides (in the case of monotone classes of graphs) with the notion of NIP and stable classes, see [1] (see also [23]). For hereditary classes the structure theory and the existence of modeling limits is more complicated (see [22]) and local-global convergence seems to provide a useful framework.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…We note that this above technique can be applied under slightly weaker hypothesis than the one we state in Theorem 3. For instance, Nešetřil and Ossona de Mendez proved that for all nowhere dense graph classes (i.e., a broad generalization of proper minor-closed graph classes and bounded-degree graphs), for any graph in the class and for any constant k, the VC-dimension of the k-neighbourhood hypergraph is constantly upper-bounded [48]. It allows us to derive the following weaker version of our Theorem 3:…”
Section: Our Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A closer look at the proof of Theorem 3 shows that it also holds if, instead of having bounded distance VC-dimension, there rather exists some constant d such that, for every 1 ≤ i ≤ k − 1, the VC-dimension of the i-neighbourhood hypergraph is at most d (the latter value is sometimes called the distance-i VC-dimension of the graph [48]). It has algorithmic implications for some special cases of sparse graphs.…”
Section: Application To Nowhere Dense Graph Classesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The theory has led to the nowhere dense/somewhere dense dichotomy that can be observed in several areas of graph theory, theoretical computer science, model theory, analysis, category theory and probability theory. Motivated by the connection with model theory -nowhere dense classes are monadically stable [1] and even have low VC-density [37] and by a possible extension of first-order model-checking algorithms for bounded expansion classes [11,12] and for nowhere dense classes [17], these notions were extended to classes that are obtained as first-order transductions of sparse classes, the structurally sparse classes [34,13]. The central tool used in our approach is the transduction machinery, which establishes a fruitful bridge between graph theory and finite model theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%