2015
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural role of the flanking DNA in mariner transposon excision

Abstract: During cut-and-paste mariner/Tc1 transposition, transposon DNA is cut precisely at its junction with flanking DNA, ensuring the transposon is neither shortened nor lengthened with each transposition event. Each transposon end is flanked by a TpA dinucleotide: the signature target site duplication of mariner/Tc1 transposition. To establish the role of this sequence in accurate DNA cleavage, we have determined the crystal structure of a pre-second strand cleavage mariner Mos1 transpososome. The structure reveals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the same as in Tn 5 and the retroviral integrases (50,51). If we now work backward in the reaction pathway: the structure of Mos1 with an uncleaved transferred strand suggests that the B metal ion activates the nucleophilic water for the cleavage step (31). Once again, this is the same as in Tn 10/5 and suggests that mariner conforms to the ping-pong mechanism proposed by Yang (48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the same as in Tn 5 and the retroviral integrases (50,51). If we now work backward in the reaction pathway: the structure of Mos1 with an uncleaved transferred strand suggests that the B metal ion activates the nucleophilic water for the cleavage step (31). Once again, this is the same as in Tn 10/5 and suggests that mariner conforms to the ping-pong mechanism proposed by Yang (48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest displacement (5.7 Å) is at P210 in the turn between β7 and α8 and around helices α8 and α10, which cradle the target DNA (Figure 9b). T 0 in the Mos1 STC is in a different orientation to the thymine (T 57 ) of the flanking target site duplication in the pre -TS cleavage PEC (Figure 9c), which is recognised by base-specific interactions with the WVPHEL motif (Dornan et al, 2015). By contrast, T 0 closely aligns with T 54 of the additional DNA duplex in the post -TS cleavage PEC (Figure 9d), which may represent the target strand before integration.
10.7554/eLife.15537.018Figure 9.Structural comparison of the Mos1 STC with the pre- and post-TS cleavage Mos1 paired-end complexes.( a ) Orthogonal views of the Mos1 STC (orange) superimposed on the pre -TS cleavage PEC (PDB ID: 4U7B, green): r.m.s.d.
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mos1 IRL PEC structure has a similar overall architecture to the Mos1 IRR PEC described previously ( 18 ) and comprises a transposase dimer bound to two IRL DNA molecules in a crossed configuration; one IRL DNA is bound by the DNA-binding domain of one monomer and the catalytic domain of the other monomer, and vice versa. As before, two additional IRL DNA duplexes interact with the catalytic domains, possibly occupying the binding sites of target DNA ( 30 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%